Cited by 31Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Universal versus selective screening for the detection, control and prognosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Argentina

Open access
McCarthy, Antonio Desmond, Curciarello, Renata, Castiglione, Nicolás, Tayeldín, Marina Fernández, Costa, Diego, Arnol, Verónica, Prospitti, Anabela, Aliano, Analía +5 more·2010·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

In all, 1,702 unselected pregnant women from the city of La Plata were tested for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and evaluated to determine GDM prevalence and risk factors. In women with GDM, we evaluated compliance with guidelines for GDM management, and perinatal complications attributable to GDM. GDM prevalence was 5.8%, and its risk factors were pre-gestational obesity, previous hyperglycaemia, age > 30 years, previous GDM (and its surrogate markers). In primi-gravida (PG) subjects, GDM was equally prevalent in the presence (4.2%) or absence (4.0%) of risk factors. In multi-gravida (MG) women, although risk factors doubled the prevalence of GDM (8.6%), in the absence of risk factors GDM prevalence was similar to that of PG women (3.9%). Half of all women with GDM received inadequate post-diagnosis obstetric control, and this induced a fourfold increase in infant perinatal complications. In conclusion, all non-hyperglycaemic 24-28-week pregnant women should be tested for GDM, although particular attention must be paid to MG women with risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-009-0107-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Argentina, there was an almost two-fold increase in gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence compared to 1995 (5.0%) and 2009 (5.8%).

    “Additionally, the authors presented an almost two-fold increase in the GDM prevalence [83] in comparison to the years: 1995 (5.0%) [84] and 2009 (5.8%) [85].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, A. D., Curciarello, R., Castiglione, N., Tayeldín, M. F., Costa, D., Arnol, V., Prospitti, A., Aliano, A., Archuby, D., Graieb, A., Torres, M. J., Etcheverry, S. B., & Apezteguía, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional de La Plata (AR)
  • Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (AR)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Antonio Desmond
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2009-03-20
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
97-103
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W2037956473
Cited by
31
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • El Servicio de Difusión de la Creación Intelectual (National University of La Plata) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, universal screening, targeted screening, GDM prevalence, risk factors, primigravida, multigravida, perinatal complications, obstetric management, Argentina
MeSH terms
Adult, Argentina, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review