Cited by 46Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Systematic review: continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion with implantable insulin pumps for diabetes mellitus

Spaan, Nienke, Teplova, Alina, Stam, Gerrit, Spaan, Jos, Lucas, Cees·2014·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

Unlabelled Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with implantable insulin pumps (IIPs) is a treatment option for diabetes, which is not widely utilized nor freely accessible in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to summarize available evidence on use of IIPs for CIPII for diabetes treatment, since its introduction to clinical use on the following outcomes: HbA1c, hypoglycaemic events, and complications of treatment. Secondary outcomes complications of diabetes and treatment satisfaction. Following the procedure for a systematic review this paper may contribute to a balanced evaluation of the need and effectiveness of IIPs. A pre-specified, registered protocol (CRD42012002150) was followed. Studies investigating all diabetes populations and types of IIPs were considered eligible. The sensitive search strategy was developed in collaboration with a clinical librarian and contents experts. PUBMED, MEDLINE, CENTRAL EMBASE, trial registries, and other databases were searched. References were screened independently by two authors, and decisions on study selection were recorded. Of the 1,703 references screened, 362 were assessed as potentially eligible. Ninety-four were identified as studies using IIPs. Fifteen papers, together reporting on four-randomized trials, and eight cohorts were included. Narrative analysis is provided, and data tables are available. CIPII by way of IIPs is effective in lowering HbA1c levels and reducing hypoglycaemic events. Superior…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-014-0557-3

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spaan, N., Teplova, A., Stam, G., Spaan, J., & Lucas, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
  • Sophia Revalidatie (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Spaan, Nienke
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2014-03-05
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
339-351
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W1995122389
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
implantable insulin pump, diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, diabetes complications, treatment satisfaction, quality of life
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infusions, Parenteral, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review