Cited by 145Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Effect of aerobic exercise intensity on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials

Liubaoerjijin, Yilina, Terada, Tasuku, Fletcher, Kevin, Boulé, Normand G.·2016·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

Aims To conduct a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials comparing aerobic exercise training of different intensities on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Methods Databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched up to January 2016. Randomized trials of at least 12 weeks in duration that compared two exercise interventions of different intensities were identified. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible trials. Using fixed effect model, weighted mean differences (WMD) between different exercise intensities were calculated for changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and secondary outcomes, such as fasting glucose and fasting insulin. Results Eight studies with a total of 235 participants were eligible. The exercise interventions lasted from 12 weeks to 6 months. The prescribed exercise intensities varied among studies. Four studies utilized vigorous exercise intensities for short durations by performing interval training. Overall, higher-intensity exercise resulted in a greater reduction in HbA1c compared to lower-intensity exercise (WMD = -0.22 %; 95 % confidence interval [-0.38, -0.06]; or -2.4 mmol/mol [-4.15, -0.66], I (2) = 0). Adherence to exercise and proportion of dropouts did not differ within trials. No adverse events were reported in these small trials with selected inclusion criteria. Conclusions Although our meta-analysis had a limited sample size, increasing exercise intensity safely accentuated reductions in HbA1c in some people with type 2 diabetes. Different approaches have been used to increase exercise intensity (i.e., some used interval training, whereas others used higher-intensity continuous exercise). However, at this time, it is unclear which form, if any, leads to the most favorable results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-016-0870-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 145

Authors
Liubaoerjijin, Y., Terada, T., Fletcher, K., & Boulé, N. G.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Boulé, Normand G.
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2016-06-02
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
769-781
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W2411741394
Cited by
145
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Partnerships for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) award from Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions (AIHS)
  • Alberta Diabetes Institute (ADI) Summer Studentship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, aerobic exercise, exercise intensity, glycemic control, HbA1c, interval training, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, exercise adherence
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review