Effect of aerobic exercise intensity on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials
Abstract
Aims To conduct a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials comparing aerobic exercise training of different intensities on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Methods Databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched up to January 2016. Randomized trials of at least 12 weeks in duration that compared two exercise interventions of different intensities were identified. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible trials. Using fixed effect model, weighted mean differences (WMD) between different exercise intensities were calculated for changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and secondary outcomes, such as fasting glucose and fasting insulin. Results Eight studies with a total of 235 participants were eligible. The exercise interventions lasted from 12 weeks to 6 months. The prescribed exercise intensities varied among studies. Four studies utilized vigorous exercise intensities for short durations by performing interval training. Overall, higher-intensity exercise resulted in a greater reduction in HbA1c compared to lower-intensity exercise (WMD = -0.22 %; 95 % confidence interval [-0.38, -0.06]; or -2.4 mmol/mol [-4.15, -0.66], I (2) = 0). Adherence to exercise and proportion of dropouts did not differ within trials. No adverse events were reported in these small trials with selected inclusion criteria. Conclusions Although our meta-analysis had a limited sample size, increasing exercise intensity safely accentuated reductions in HbA1c in some people with type 2 diabetes. Different approaches have been used to increase exercise intensity (i.e., some used interval training, whereas others used higher-intensity continuous exercise). However, at this time, it is unclear which form, if any, leads to the most favorable results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More intense domains and/or purposeful exercise are crucial for improving glycaemic control.
“It has been hypothesised that these findings are due to PA trackers promoting low-intensity lifestyle PA (ie, accrual of PA through everyday activities) rather than more intense domains and/or purposeful exercise,14 crucial for improving glycaemic control.4 16”
Progressively increasing the duration and intensity of aerobic exercise can lead to further improvements in A1c.
“Progressively increasing the duration and intensity of aerobic exercise can lead to further improvements in A1c.”
From The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Liubaoerjijin, Y., Terada, T., Fletcher, K., & Boulé, N. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Boulé, Normand G.
- Venue
- Acta Diabetologica
- Published
- 2016-06-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 769-781
- ISSN
- 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5233
- OpenAlex
- W2411741394
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Partnerships for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) award from Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions (AIHS)
- Alberta Diabetes Institute (ADI) Summer Studentship
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, aerobic exercise, exercise intensity, glycemic control, HbA1c, interval training, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, exercise adherence
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review