Metformin combined with insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A propensity score-matched study
Abstract
Aim Metformin use in gestational diabetes (GDM) is a common practice. Although its use in combination with insulin might be advantageous, it was never formally tested. We studied whether combined treatment was associated with better obstetric or neonatal outcomes compared to insulin alone. Methods This is a retrospective study, using the Portuguese National Registry of GDM (2012-2017), of women treated with insulin ± metformin. Primary endpoints were obstetric and neonatal complications. Secondary endpoints were gestational weight gain (GWG) and insulin dose. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance the distribution of age, BMI, insulin treatment duration, HbA1c, first trimester diagnosis of GDM and previous GDM or macrosomia. Women treated with metformin plus insulin and insulin only were then compared. Results A total of 4034 women were treated with insulin or insulin plus metformin (10.2%). After propensity score matching, we studied two groups of 386 patients. Obstetric and neonatal complications were similar. Women treated with metformin plus insulin had 201 (52.1%) obstetric complications versus 184 (47.7%) in insulin-only group, p = 0.22; and 112 (29.0%) neonatal complications versus 96 (24.9%), p = 0.19. Patients treated with metformin plus insulin had similar GWG, excessive weight gain and insulin dose compared to the insulin-only group. Conclusions Women with GDM treated with insulin plus metformin had similar obstetric and neonatal complications, weight gained and insulin dose compared to those only treated with insulin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Portuguese Gynecological Society uses the IADPSG criteria for screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus.
“The Portuguese Gynecological Society uses the IADPSG criteria for screening and diagnosing GDM [109].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [109]
Cites
Metzger, B. E., Gabbe, S. G., Persson, B., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Oats, J. J. N., & Buchanan, T. A. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-0719 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes
Rowan, J. A., Hague, W. M., Gao, W., Battin, M. R., & Moore, M. P. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707193 · Cited by 1,291 · see citing works
(2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.012 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Yogev, Y., Xenakis, E. M. J., & Langer, O. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.074 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Chiswick, C., Reynolds, R. M., Denison, F., Drake, A. J., Forbes, S., Newby, D. E., Walker, B. R., Quenby, S., Wray, S., Weeks, A., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00219-3 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
The Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes
Melchior, H., Kurch-Bek, D., & Mund, M. (2017) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2017.0412 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Comparison of glyburide and insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis
Song, R., Chen, L., Chen, Y., Si, X., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Irwin, D. M., & Feng, W. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182488 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chaves, C., Cunha, F., Martinho, M., Garrido, S., Silva-Vieira, M., Estevinho, C., Melo, A., Figueiredo, O., Morgado, A., Almeida, M. C., & Almeida, M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Padre Américo (PT)
- Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa (PT)
- Unidade Local de Saúde de Coimbra (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Chaves, Catarina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Acta Diabetologica
- Published
- 2021-01-18
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 615-621
- ISSN
- 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5233
- OpenAlex
- W3121803265
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, metformin, insulin therapy, combination therapy, pregnancy complications, neonatal complications, gestational weight gain, insulin dose, pregnancy outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Metformin, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Weight Gain, Diabetes, Gestational, Propensity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review