Cited by 6Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

Development and external validation of a machine learning model to predict diabetic nephropathy in T1DM patients in the real-world

Du, Zouxi, Liu, Xiaoning, Li, Jiayu, Min, Hang, Ma, Yuhu, Hua, Wenting, Zhang, Leyuan, Zhang, Yue +4 more·2024·Acta Diabetologica

Abstract

Aims Studies on machine learning (ML) for the prediction of diabetic nephropathy (DN) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients are rare. This study focused on the development and external validation of an explainable ML model to predict the risk of DN among individuals with T1DM. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study conducted across 19 hospitals in Gansu Province, China (No: 2022-473). In total, 1368 patients were eligible for analysis among 1633 collected T1DM patients from January 2016 to December 2023. Recursive feature elimination using random forest and fivefold cross-validation was conducted to identify key features. Among the 12 initial ML algorithms, the optimal ML model was developed and validated externally in a distinct population, and its predictive outcomes were explained via the SHapley additive exPlanations method, which offered personalized decision insights. Results Among the 1368 T1DM patients, 324 had DN. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model, which achieved optimal performance with an AUC of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76‒89), was selected to predict the risk of DN among T1DM patients. The DN predictive model included variables such as T1DM duration, postprandial glucose (PPG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum creatinine (Scr) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). External validation confirmed the reliability of the model, with an AUC of 76% (95% CI: 70‒82). Conclusions The ML pre…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00592-024-02404-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, Z., Liu, X., Li, J., Min, H., Ma, Y., Hua, W., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Shang, M., Chen, H., Yin, H., & Tian, L.
Affiliations
  • Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN)
  • First Hospital of Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Tian, Limin
Venue
Acta Diabetologica
Published
2024-11-11
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
869-879
ISSN
  • 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5233
OpenAlex
W4404219792
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
the Science and Technology Major Project, Gansu Province \ (22ZD6FA033)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetic nephropathy, type 1 diabetes, risk prediction, machine learning, XGBoost, SHAP, external validation, HbA1c, serum creatinine, LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, postprandial blood glucose, disease duration
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Blood Glucose, China, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review