Development and external validation of a machine learning model to predict diabetic nephropathy in T1DM patients in the real-world
Abstract
Aims Studies on machine learning (ML) for the prediction of diabetic nephropathy (DN) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients are rare. This study focused on the development and external validation of an explainable ML model to predict the risk of DN among individuals with T1DM. Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study conducted across 19 hospitals in Gansu Province, China (No: 2022-473). In total, 1368 patients were eligible for analysis among 1633 collected T1DM patients from January 2016 to December 2023. Recursive feature elimination using random forest and fivefold cross-validation was conducted to identify key features. Among the 12 initial ML algorithms, the optimal ML model was developed and validated externally in a distinct population, and its predictive outcomes were explained via the SHapley additive exPlanations method, which offered personalized decision insights. Results Among the 1368 T1DM patients, 324 had DN. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model, which achieved optimal performance with an AUC of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76‒89), was selected to predict the risk of DN among T1DM patients. The DN predictive model included variables such as T1DM duration, postprandial glucose (PPG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum creatinine (Scr) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). External validation confirmed the reliability of the model, with an AUC of 76% (95% CI: 70‒82). Conclusions The ML pre…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Du et al. model achieved robust cross-center prediction and supported early risk assessment.
“achieving robust cross-center prediction and supporting early risk assessment.”
From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Ghassemi, M., Liu, X., Reitsma, J. B., van Smeden, M., et al. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078378 · Cited by 4,718 · see citing works
Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference
Tuttle, K. R., Bakris, G. L., Bilous, R. W., Chiang, J. L., de Boer, I. H., Goldstein-Fuchs, J., Hirsch, I. B., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Narva, A. S., Navaneethan, S. D., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-1296 · Cited by 1,153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xie, X., Wu, C., Huang, Z., Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Dao, F., Yan, D., Deng, K., Lyu, H., Ma, C., et al. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag083 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Du, Z., Liu, X., Li, J., Min, H., Ma, Y., Hua, W., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Shang, M., Chen, H., Yin, H., & Tian, L.
- Affiliations
- Gansu Provincial Hospital (CN)
- First Hospital of Lanzhou University (CN)
- Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tian, Limin
- Venue
- Acta Diabetologica
- Published
- 2024-11-11
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 869-879
- ISSN
- 0940-5429 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5233
- OpenAlex
- W4404219792
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Acta Diabetologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- the Science and Technology Major Project, Gansu Province \ (22ZD6FA033)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- diabetic nephropathy, type 1 diabetes, risk prediction, machine learning, XGBoost, SHAP, external validation, HbA1c, serum creatinine, LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, postprandial blood glucose, disease duration
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Blood Glucose, China, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review