WebRTC-based video conferencing service for telehealth
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technology can be used in the care of older people who may have poorer digital literacy.
“The majority of the studies targeted interventions for people aged 50 years and older, indicating, contrary to some opinions [62], technology can be used in the care of older people who may have poorer digital literacy.”
From Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review (2018) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Jang-Jaccard, J., Nepal, S., Celler, B., & Yan, B.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Venue
- Computing
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 169-193
- ISSN
- 0010-485X (ISSN-L)
- 1436-5057
- OpenAlex
- W2092502421
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Computing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
- Keywords
- WebRTC, videoconferencing, telemedicine, real-time communication, care coordinators, remote patient monitoring, JavaScript API
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
