Cited by 14Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Advances of MR imaging in glioma: What the neurosurgeon needs to know

Open access
Falk Delgado, Anna·2025·Acta Neurochirurgica

Abstract

Glial tumors and especially glioblastoma present a major challenge in neuro-oncology due to their infiltrative growth, resistance to therapy, and poor overall survival—despite aggressive treatments such as maximal safe resection and chemoradiotherapy. These tumors typically manifest through neurological symptoms such as seizures, headaches, and signs of increased intracranial pressure, prompting urgent neuroimaging. At initial diagnosis, MRI plays a central role in differentiating true neoplasms from tumor mimics, including inflammatory or infectious conditions. Advanced techniques such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) enhance diagnostic specificity and may prevent unnecessary surgical intervention. In the preoperative phase, MRI contributes to surgical planning through the use of functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), enabling localization of eloquent cortex and white matter tracts. These modalities support safer resections by informing trajectory planning and risk assessment. Emerging MR techniques, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy, amide proton transfer imaging, and 2HG quantification, offer further potential in delineating tumor infiltration beyond contrast-enhancing margins. Postoperatively, MRI is important for evaluating residual tumor, detecting surgical complications, and guiding radiotherapy planning. During treatment surveillance, MRI assists in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis, thereby guiding decisions on additional surgery, changes in systemic therapy, or inclusion into clinical trials. The continued evolution of MRI hardware, software, and image analysis—particularly with the integration of machine learning—will be critical for supporting precision neurosurgical oncology. This review highlights how advanced MRI techniques can inform clinical decision-making at each stage of care in patients with high-grade gliomas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00701-025-06593-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restricted diffusion is often associated with hypercellularity, but ADC is also influenced by edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, microvascular architecture, and intratumoral heterogeneity.

    “Restricted diffusion is often associated with hypercellularity, but ADC is also influenced by edema, necrosis, hemorrhage, microvascular architecture, and intratumoral heterogeneity (Falk Delgado, 2025).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Falk Delgado, 2025

    The Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) section (page unavailable) links low ADC and restricted diffusion to densely packed tumor cells, and notes diffusion differences between infiltrative tumor and vasogenic edema. It also describes effects of tissue microstructure on diffusion and blood products on DWI image quality. It does not establish that necrosis, microvascular architecture, or intratumoral heterogeneity influence ADC, or that hemorrhage directly changes ADC. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1]Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X et al (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73(1):102–116 24715426 PMC4190138 · DOI
  2. [2]Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: what can we gain? Neuroimage 34(1):144–155 17070705 PMC7116582 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Benson JC, Carlson ML, Lane JI (2021) Non-EPI versus multishot EPI DWI in cholesteatoma detection: correlation with operative findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42(3):573–577 33334855 PMC7959419 · DOI
  4. [4]Bette S, Gempt J, Huber T, Boeckh-Behrens T, Ringel F, Meyer B, Zimmer C, Kirschke JS (2016) Patterns and time dependence of unspecific enhancement in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after glioblastoma resection. World Neurosurg 90:440–447 27001238 · DOI
  5. [5]Boa Sorte AA Jr, Garcia CC, Neto MR, de Oliveira MF, Rotta JM (2022) Brain cryptococcoma mimicking a glioblastoma in an immunocompetent patient: a rare case report and comprehensive review. SurgNeurol Int 13:114. 10.25259/SNI_1243_2021 PMC9062938 35509529 · DOI
  6. [6]Bonosi L, Marrone S, Benigno UE, Buscemi F, Musso S, Porzio M, Silven MP, Torregrossa F, Grasso G (2023) Maximal safe resection in glioblastoma surgery: a systematic review of advanced intraoperative image-guided techniques. Brain Sci. 10.3390/brainsci13020216 36831759 PMC9954589 · DOI
  7. [7]Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS et al (2020) Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 22(9):1262–1275 32516388 PMC7523451 · DOI
  8. [9]Cereda GS, Doniselli FM, Deleo F et al (2025) High-grade gliomas with autoimmune encephalitis-like presentation: case report and systematic review of the literature. Neurol Sci. 10.1007/s10072-025-08159-x 40214926 · DOI
  9. [10]Chen H, Tan G, Zhong L et al (2024) MR perfusion characteristics of pseudoprogression in brain tumors treated with immunotherapy - a comparative study with chemo-radiation induced pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol. 10.1007/s11060-024-04910-0 39688766 PMC11832695 · DOI
  10. [11]Delgado AF, Nilsson M, Latini F, Mårtensson J, Zetterling M, Berntsson SG, Alafuzoff I, Lätt J, Larsson E-M (2016) Preoperative quantitative MR tractography compared with visual tract evaluation in patients with neuropathologically confirmed gliomas grades II and III: a prospective cohort study. Radiol Res Pract 2016(1):7671854 27190647 PMC4852118
  11. [12]Falk Delgado A, De Luca F, van Westen D, Falk Delgado A (2018) Arterial spin labeling MR imaging for differentiation between high- and low-grade glioma-a meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol 20(11):1450–1461 29868920 PMC6176798 · DOI
  12. [13]Falk Delgado A, Nilsson M, van Westen D, Falk Delgado A (2018) Glioma grade discrimination with MR diffusion kurtosis imaging: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 287(1):119–127 29206593 · DOI
  13. [14]Fan X, Roberts DW, Schaewe TJ, Ji S, Holton LH, Simon DA, Paulsen KD (2017) Intraoperative image updating for brain shift following dural opening. J Neurosurg 126(6):1924–1933 27611206 PMC5549265 · DOI
  14. [15]Farace P, Amelio D, Ricciardi GK, Zoccatelli G, Magon S, Pizzini F, Alessandrini F, Sbarbati A, Amichetti M, Beltramello A (2013) Early MRI changes in glioblastoma in the period between surgery and adjuvant therapy. J Neurooncol 111(2):177–185 23264191 · DOI
  15. [16]Feng A, Yuan P, Huang T, Li L, Lyu J (2022) Distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI. Acad Radiol 29(9):1320–1331 34896001 · DOI
  16. [17]Foltyn-Dumitru M, Banan R, Schell M, Mahmutoglu MA, Kessler T, Wick W, Brugnara G, Bendszus M, Sahm F, Vollmuth P (2025) Histopathological and molecular characteristics of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma without contrast enhancement: implications for clinical outcomes. Neuro Oncol. 10.1093/neuonc/noaf070 40108725 PMC12417822 · DOI
  17. [18]Gabriel M, Brennan NP, Peck KK, Holodny AI (2014) Blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging for presurgical planning. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 24(4):557–571 25441500 · DOI
  18. [19]Hiremath SB, Muraleedharan A, Kumar S, Nagesh C, Kesavadas C, Abraham M, Kapilamoorthy TR, Thomas B (2017) Combining diffusion tensor metrics and DSC perfusion imaging: can it improve the diagnostic accuracy in differentiating tumefactive demyelination from high-grade glioma? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(4):685–690 28209583 PMC7960259 · DOI
  19. [20]Hung ND, Van Dung L, Vi NH, Hai Anh N-T, Hong Phuong L-T, Hieu ND, Duc NM (2023) The role of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance perfusion and spectroscopy in distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary brain metastasis. J Clin Imaging Sci 13:19 37559877 PMC10408633 · DOI
  20. [21]Ikeguchi R, Shimizu Y, Abe K, Shimizu S, Maruyama T, Nitta M, Abe K, Kawamata T, Kitagawa K (2018) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy differentiates tumefactive demyelinating lesions from gliomas. Mult Scler Relat Disord 26:77–84 30237108 · DOI
  21. [22]Iversen DH, Wein W, Lindseth F, Unsgård G, Reinertsen I (2018) Automatic intraoperative correction of brain shift for accurate neuronavigation. World Neurosurg 120:e1071–e1078 30213682 · DOI
  22. [23]Kim HS, Goh MJ, Kim N, Choi CG, Kim SJ, Kim JH (2014) Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Radiology 273(3):831–843 24885857 · DOI
  23. [24]Kim MM, Parmar HA, Aryal MP, Mayo CS, Balter JM, Lawrence TS, Cao Y (2019) Developing a pipeline for multiparametric MRI-guided radiation therapy: initial results from a phase II clinical trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Tomography 5(1):118–126 30854449 PMC6403045 · DOI
  24. [25]Kolakshyapati M, Adhikari RB, Karlowee V et al (2018) Nonenhancing peritumoral hyperintense lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging in glioblastoma: a novel diagnostic and specific prognostic indicator. J Neurosurg 128(3):667–678 28362236 · DOI
  25. [26]Krings T, Schreckenberger M, Rohde V et al (2002) Functional MRI and 18F FDG-positron emission tomography for presurgical planning: comparison with electrical cortical stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144(9):889–99 (discussion 899) 12376770 · DOI
  26. [27]Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, Peccerelli N, Chheang S, Gruber ML, Miller DC, Golfinos JG, Zagzag D, Johnson G (2008) Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 247(2):490–498 18349315 PMC3774106 · DOI
  27. [28]Lazar M, Jensen JH, Xuan L, Helpern JA (2008) Estimation of the orientation distribution function from diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 60(4):774–781 18816827 PMC2562250 · DOI
  28. [29]Le Bihan D, Poupon C, Amadon A, Lethimonnier F (2006) Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(3):478–488 16897692 · DOI
  29. [30]Le Bihan D, Turner R, Douek P, Patronas N (1992) Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159(3):591–599 1503032 · DOI
  30. [31]Lolli VE, Coolen T, Sadeghi N, Voordecker P, Lefranc F (2023) BOLD fMRI and DTI fiber tracking for preoperative mapping of eloquent cerebral regions in brain tumor patients: impact on surgical approach and outcome. Neurol Sci 44(8):2903–2914 36914833 · DOI
  31. [32]Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23(8):1231–1251 34185076 PMC8328013 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [33]Lu W, Feng J, Zou Y, Liu Y, Gao P, Zhao Y, Wu X, Ma H (2024) 1H-MRS parameters in non-enhancing peritumoral regions can predict the recurrence of glioblastoma. Sci Rep 14(1):29258 39587278 PMC11589107 · DOI
  33. [34]McKinnon C, Nandhabalan M, Murray SA, Plaha P (2021) Glioblastoma: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. BMJ 374:n1560 34261630 · DOI
  34. [35]Melnick K, Miller P, Carmichael E, Wang Y, Tran D, Kresak JL, Ghiaseddin A, Rahman M (2022) Histologic findings at the time of repeat resection predicts survival in patients with glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 168:e451–e459 36206964 · DOI
  35. [36]Mirzayeva LS, Uçar M, Budak SN, Kaymaz AM, Yaylı N (2025) Pushing the boundaries of neurosurgical oncology: evaluating the superiority of supratotal resection over gross total resection in intraoperative MRI-guided glioma surgery. Neurosurg Rev 48(1):200 39909935 PMC11799004 · DOI
  36. [37]Neska-Matuszewska M, Bladowska J, Sąsiadek M, Zimny A (2018) Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme, metastases and primary central nervous system lymphomas using multiparametric perfusion and diffusion MR imaging of a tumor core and a peritumoral zone-Searching for a practical approach. PLoS One 13(1):e0191341 29342201 PMC5771619 · DOI
  37. [38]Niyazi M, Andratschke N, Bendszus M et al (2023) ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 184:109663 37059335 · DOI
  38. [39]Otani Y, Higaki F, Fujii K et al (2024) Comparative analysis of intraoperative MRI and early postoperative MRI findings in glioma surgery patients. J Neurosurg 1-9. 10.3171/2024.7.JNS24784 39729586 · DOI
  39. [40]Otto KM, Ehricke H-H, Kumar V, Klose U (2013) Angular smoothing and radial regularization of ODF fields: application on deterministic crossing fiber tractography. Phys Med 29(1):17–32 22051017 · DOI
  40. [41]Ozawa M, Brennan PM, Zienius K, Kurian KM, Hollingworth W, Weller D, Grant R, Hamilton W, Ben-Shlomo Y (2019) The usefulness of symptoms alone or combined for general practitioners in considering the diagnosis of a brain tumour: a case-control study using the clinical practice research database (CPRD) (2000–2014). BMJ Open 9(8):e029686 31471440 PMC6720478 · DOI
  41. [42]Qiu Y, Li Y, Jiang C et al (2024) Toxicity and efficacy of different target volume delineations of radiation therapy based on the updated radiation therapy oncology group/national research group and European organization for research and treatment of cancer guidelines in patients with grade 3–4 glioma: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.094 39615657 · DOI
  42. [43]Rivera CA, Bhatia S, Morell AA et al (2024) Metabolic signatures derived from whole-brain MR-spectroscopy identify early tumor progression in high-grade gliomas using machine learning. J Neurooncol 170(3):579–589 39180640 PMC11614968 · DOI
  43. [44]Rykkje AM, Carlsen JF, Larsen VA, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Christensen IJ, Nielsen MB, Poulsen HS, Urup TH, Hansen AE (2024) Prognostic relevance of radiological findings on early postoperative MRI for 187 consecutive glioblastoma patients receiving standard therapy. Sci Rep 14(1):10985 38744979 PMC11094076 · DOI
  44. [45]Sakata A, Okada T, Yamamoto A et al (2015) Grading glial tumors with amide proton transfer MR imaging: different analytical approaches. J Neurooncol 122(2):339–348 25559689 · DOI
  45. [46]Schön S, Cabello J, Liesche-Starnecker F et al (2020) Imaging glioma biology: spatial comparison of amino acid PET, amide proton transfer, and perfusion-weighted MRI in newly diagnosed gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47(6):1468–1475 31953672 PMC7188730 · DOI
  46. [47]Senger KPS, Kesavadas C, Thomas B, Singh A, Multani GS, An D, Label M, Suchandrima B, Shin D (2023) Experimenting with ASL-based arterialized cerebral blood volume as a novel imaging biomarker in grading glial neoplasms. Neuroradiol J 36(6):728–735 37548164 PMC10649543 · DOI
  47. [48]Sourbron SP, Buckley DL (2013) Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed 26(8):1004–1027 23674304 · DOI
  48. [49]Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K (2009) Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 62(1):205–217 19449435 · DOI
  49. [50]Suh CH, Kim HS, Jung SC, Choi CG, Kim SJ (2018) 2-Hydroxyglutarate MR spectroscopy for prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant glioma: a systemic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data. Neuro Oncol 20(12):1573–1583 30020513 PMC6231199 · DOI
  50. [51]Suh CH, Kim HS, Jung SC, Park JE, Choi CG, Kim SJ (2019) MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 50(2):560–572 30637843 · DOI
  51. [52]Tang PLY, Romero AM, Nout RA, van Rij C, Slagter C, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smits M, Warnert EAH (2024) Amide proton transfer-weighted CEST MRI for radiotherapy target delineation of glioblastoma: a prospective pilot study. Eur Radiol Exp 8(1):123 39477835 PMC11525355 · DOI
  52. [53]Vallatos A, Al-Mubarak HFI, Birch JL, Galllagher L, Mullin JM, Gilmour L, Holmes WM, Chalmers AJ (2019) Quantitative histopathologic assessment of perfusion MRI as a marker of glioblastoma cell infiltration in and beyond the peritumoral edema region. J Magn Reson Imaging 50(2):529–540 30569620 · DOI
  53. [54]Villanueva-Meyer JE, Wood MD, Choi BS, Mabray MC, Butowski NA, Tihan T, Cha S (2018) MRI features and IDH mutational status of grade II diffuse gliomas: impact on diagnosis and prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210(3):621–628 29261348 PMC5823758 · DOI
  54. [55]Wakabayashi M, Ogiwara T, Ito K, Sato A, Hanaoka Y, Kobayashi K, Shimizu Y, Hongo K (2025) Glioblastoma mimicking autoimmune meningitis in an adult: a complex diagnostic challenge. Surg Neurol Int 16:61 40041069 PMC11878707 · DOI
  55. [56]Wen PY, van den Bent M, Youssef G et al (2023) RANO 2.0: update to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria for high- and low-grade gliomas in adults. J Clin Oncol 41(33):5187–5199 37774317 PMC10860967 · DOI
  56. [57]Woodall RT, Sahoo P, Cui Y et al (2021) Repeatability of tumor perfusion kinetics from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 3(1):vdab174 34988454 PMC8715899
  57. [58]Zaccagna F, Riemer F, Priest AN et al (2019) Non-invasive assessment of glioma microstructure using VERDICT MRI: correlation with histology. Eur Radiol 29(10):5559–5566 30888488 PMC6719328 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falk Delgado, A.
Venue
Acta Neurochirurgica
Published
2025-06-21
Volume
167
Issue
1
Pages
174-174
ISSN
  • 0001-6268 (ISSN-L)
  • 0942-0940
OpenAlex
W4411504571
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neurochirurgica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Supported by grants provided by the Stockholm County Council, Wibergs foundation, Magnus Bergvall foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine, Matsumurai foundation, KI funds.
  • Karolinska Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
glioma, glioblastoma, high-grade glioma, neuroimaging, perfusion MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, amide proton transfer imaging, tumor infiltration, surgical planning, residual tumor assessment, pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, machine learning, neurosurgical oncology
MeSH terms
Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review