Cited by 15

Granule cells of the dentate gyrus with basal and recurrent dendrites in schizophrenic patients and controls. A comparative Golgi study

Senitz, D., Beckmann, H.·2003·Journal of Neural Transmission

Abstract

We report on structural variability of granule cells in the human dentate gyrus. Granule cells with basal and recurrent dendrites are a normal finding in the human brain. We detect 28.3% granule cells with basal dendrites in non-psychiatrically ill humans compared to rats (2%) and primates (10%). This can be seen as an indication for the higher phylogeny of the human brain. In addition we find a significantly higher incidence of granule cells with basal dendrites (45.7%) in brains of schizophrenic patients. Whereas drug influences during lifetime cannot fully be excluded, we tend to interpret this finding as a plastic reaction to prenatal developmental malformations of the impinging rostral entorhinal region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00702-002-0776-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aberrant dendrite orientation and multiple primary dendrites have been previously described in studies of hippocampal neuron phenotypes in schizophrenia.

    “Surprisingly, both aberrant dendrite orientation and the presence of multiple primary dendrites have been previously described in studies of hippocampal neuron phenotypes in schizophrenia [33–36].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senitz, D., & Beckmann, H.
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
317-326
ISSN
  • 0300-9564
  • 1435-1463
Cited by
15
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review