Cited by 50Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiety in mice and men: a comparison

Hohoff, Christa·2009·Journal of Neural Transmission

Abstract

Anxiety is one of the most fundamental emotions required to survive or to cope with potential threatening stimuli. Under certain circumstances, it can change to excessive or maladaptive response and might manifest in anxious personality or even anxiety disorders. Genetic studies provide a number of promising candidate genes that, however, account for only a few percent of the phenotypic variance. Social and material environmental effects such as stressful life events, drugs or chemicals and particular behavioural influences such as parental care are suggested to interact with gene effects presumably involving epigenetic processes. Such interaction probably modifies an individual's predisposition, personality and susceptibility to develop normal or low anxiety or even maladaptive or excessive anxiety. Since human anxiety involves complex emotions as well as cognitions, unique experiences and an individual genetic make-up, studies trying to clarify the complex and functionally interwoven pathogenesis of anxious personality or anxiety disorders often adopt a reductionistic, simplifying approach. Therein, mice constitute an invaluable tool for modelling human anxiety in its various forms as they display remarkable similarities on anatomical, physiological, biochemical, molecular and behavioural levels. This review aims to fit observations and results obtained from men and mice on behavioural, genetic and environmental levels in response to different threatening stimuli elucidatin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00702-009-0215-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain circuitry underlying anxiety, including neuronal pathways and neurotransmitters, is highly conserved between humans and rodents.

    “Brain circuitry underlying anxiety, including neuronal pathways and neurotransmitters, is highly conserved between humans and rodents (Hohoff, 2009).”
  • Assays reliant on pavlovian fear conditioning are also applicable to post-traumatic stress disorder models, so results should be interpreted carefully.

    “Importantly, assays reliant on pavlovian fear conditioning are also applicable to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models, so results should be interpreted carefully (Hohoff, 2009).”
  • The use of rodent models in anxiety research has been consistently validated through the administration of drugs that exert anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects in humans, where they are shown to exert similar effects measurable according to the tests discussed.

    “Furthermore, the use of rodent models in anxiety research has been consistently validated through the administration of drugs that exert anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects in humans, where they are shown to exert similar effects that are, in turn, measurable according to the tests discussed below (Hohoff, 2009).”
  • One runs the risk of overinterpreting data retrieved from animal studies when applying them to human psychiatric theory, since studying anxiety in animals requires a simplified, reductionist approach.

    “One often runs the risk of overinterpreting data retrieved from animal studies when applying them to human psychiatric theory, since studying anxiety in animals requires a simplified, reductionist approach (Hohoff, 2009).”
  • Avoidance behaviors measured in the light/dark box, elevated plus maze, and open field assays are homologous to the maladaptive avoidance behaviors observed in human anxiety disorders, where perceived threats such as places and situations are avoided.

    “Avoidance behaviors measured in these three assays are homologous to the maladaptive avoidance behaviors observed in human anxiety disorders, where perceived threats, such as places and situations, are avoided (Hohoff, 2009).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 50

Authors
Hohoff, C.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Hohoff, Christa
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2009-04-02
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
679-687
ISSN
  • 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1463
OpenAlex
W2005541177
Cited by
50
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anxiety, anxiety disorders, epigenetics, gene-environment interaction, life events, parental care, threatening stimuli
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review