Cited by 164Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Wearable sensor-based objective assessment of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease

Ossig, Christiana, Antonini, Angelo, Buhmann, Carsten, Classen, Joseph, Csoti, Ilona, Falkenburger, Björn, Schwarz, Michael, Winkler, Jürgen +1 more·2016·Journal of Neural Transmission

Abstract

Effective management and development of new treatment strategies of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) largely depend on clinical rating instruments like the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) and the modified abnormal involuntary movement scale (mAIMS). Regarding inter-rater variability and continuous monitoring, clinical rating scales have various limitations. Patient-administered questionnaires such as the PD home diary to assess motor stages and fluctuations in late-stage PD are frequently used in clinical routine and as clinical trial endpoints, but diary/questionnaire are tiring, and recall bias impacts on data quality, particularly in patients with cognitive dysfunction or depression. Consequently, there is a strong need for continuous and objective monitoring of motor symptoms in PD for improving therapeutic regimen and for usage in clinical trials. Recent advances in battery technology, movement sensors such as gyroscopes, accelerometers and information technology boosted the field of objective measurement of movement in everyday life and medicine using wearable sensors allowing continuous (long-term) monitoring. This systematic review summarizes the current wearable sensor-based devices to objectively assess the various motor symptoms of PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00702-015-1439-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 164

Authors
Ossig, C., Antonini, A., Buhmann, C., Classen, J., Csoti, I., Falkenburger, B., Schwarz, M., Winkler, J., & Storch, A.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Klinikum Dortmund (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Storch, Alexander
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2015-08-08
Volume
123
Issue
1
Pages
57-64
ISSN
  • 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1463
OpenAlex
W1070793310
Cited by
164
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, wearable sensors, motor symptoms, objective assessment, continuous monitoring, accelerometer, gyroscope, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, abnormal involuntary movements, motor fluctuations, clinical trial endpoints, patient-reported outcome questionnaires
MeSH terms
Humans, Movement, Parkinson Disease, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Monitoring, Ambulatory, PubMed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review