Cited by 103Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDisability Education and EmploymentPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ADHD at the workplace: ADHD symptoms, diagnostic status, and work-related functioning

Open access

Abstract

Adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) commonly experience impairments in multiple domains of daily living. Work has a central role in daily life and is susceptible to ADHD due to its cognitive demands. The present study seeks to examine the nature of work-related problems and impairments of adults with ADHD, and explores the association to ADHD symptoms and neuropsychological test performance. A community sample of 1231 individuals took part in this study and completed a set of questionnaires assessing ADHD symptoms and work-related problems. Furthermore, a clinical sample of 134 adults diagnosed with ADHD were recruited from an ADHD outpatient clinic, who completed the same set of questionnaires. A subsample of 51 patients with ADHD additionally performed a neuropsychological assessment using tests of attention and executive functions. Work-related problems were found both in individuals of the community sample with symptoms of ADHD and individuals diagnosed with ADHD. Individuals with ADHD reported work related problems particularly in not meeting their own standards and perceived potential, yet it less commonly manifests in negative performance evaluations at work or job loss. ADHD symptoms, in particular symptoms of inattention, were found to be strongly associated with work-related problems, whereas neuropsychological test performance was no meaningful predictor of functioning at work. This study emphasizes the susceptibility of individuals' functioning at work to ADHD symptoms and impairments associated with ADHD. ADHD related difficulties at work should be considered in the clinical evaluation and targeted screening at the work place to provide support when indicated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00702-021-02309-z

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Comparison of the proportion of individuals indicating impairment (score ≥ 2) in each of the WFIRS Work item between patients with ADHD (n = 134) and the community comparison group (n = 268)
Fig. 1 Comparison of the proportion of individuals indicating impairment (score ≥ 2) in each of the WFIRS Work item between patients with ADHD (n = 134) and the community comparison group (n = 268)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Aschenbrenner S, Tucha O, Lange KW (2000) Regensburg Word Fluency Test (RWT). Hogrefe, Goettingen
  2. Bitto H, Mörstedt B, Faschina S, Stieglitz R (2017) ADHD in adults: a dimensional or categorical construct? ZPPP 65:121–132
  3. Conners CK, Erhardt D, Sparrow EP (1998) Conners adult attention rating scale—self-report: long version. Multi-Health Systems, North Tonawanda
  4. Schuhfried G (2010) Vienna Test System: Psychological assessment. SCHUHFRIED GmbH, Mödling, Austria

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–103 of 103

Metadata

Authors
Fuermaier, A. B. M., Tucha, L., Butzbach, M., Weisbrod, M., Aschenbrenner, S., & Tucha, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • SRH Klinikum Karlsbad-Langensteinbach (DE)
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Venue
Journal of Neural Transmission
Published
2021-02-02
Volume
128
Issue
7
Pages
1021-1031
ISSN
  • 0300-9564 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1463
OpenAlex
W3128446842
Cited by
103
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Transmission (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Groningen, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
adult ADHD, work-related problems, ADHD symptoms, inattention, executive function, attention, neuropsychological performance, employee performance, workplace screening, job loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review