Prevalence and psychosocial correlates of perinatal depression: a cohort study from urban Pakistan
Abstract
Depression around childbirth is common in low income countries. The aim of this study was to examine the factors associated with persistence of depression from the antenatal to the postnatal period in urban Pakistan. A total of 1,357 pregnant women in their third trimester attending the antenatal clinic were included in the study. From these, 763 mothers who delivered at the study maternity home were reassessed after 3 months of childbirth. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was administered to measure depression in both the antenatal and the postnatal periods. Psychological distress, disability and life events experienced by mothers were also measured by using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), Brief Disability Questionnaire (BDQ), and Life Events Checklist, respectively. We found 25.8% prevalence rate of antenatal depression and 38.3% persistent depression in a private clinic. Persistently depressed mothers had significantly high psychological distress, more disability, and experienced more stressful life events than the resolved group. Our findings confirm the high rates of depression during pregnancy but we found low rates of persistent depression in this urban population as compared to the previous report. There is a need for further investigation of factors associated with persistent depression in order to develop appropriate interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Pakistan, perinatal depression rates are higher than most LMICs, reported to range between 25 and 38%.
“In Pakistan, these rates are even higher than most LMICs, reported to range between 25 and 38 % [3, 4].”
From Barefoot therapists: barriers and facilitators to delivering maternal mental health care through peer volunteers in Pakistan: a qualitative study (2016) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Husain, N., Parveen, A., Husain, M., Saeed, Q., Jafri, F., Rahman, R., Tomenson, B., & Chaudhry, I. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Pakistan Institute of Learning and Living (PK)
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Karachi Medical and Dental College (PK)
- Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Parveen, Asia
- Venue
- Archives of Women's Mental Health
- Published
- 2011-09-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 395-403
- ISSN
- 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-1102
- OpenAlex
- W1990478985
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- perinatal depression, antenatal depression, postpartum depression, dysthymia, depression prevalence, psychological distress, disability, life events, pregnant women, urban Pakistan, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pakistan, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Depression, Postpartum, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review