The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laboratory glassware cleaning validation in pharmaceutical industry: a case study
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- National Agency of Medicine and Health Products Safety ANSM (2015) Good Manufacturing Practices Guide. Chapter 6: Quality Control
- Polonini H, Grossi L, Ferreira A, Brandão M (2011) Development of a standardized procedure for cleaning glass apparatus in analytical laboratories. Rev Ciênc Farm Básica Apl 32(1):133–136
Cited by
Indirect Determination of the Internal Diameter of Glass Conical Volumetric Instruments
Purata Sifuentes, O. J. (2023) · Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento · doi:10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2023.25.85557 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Belgacem, L., & Cherif, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Algiers Benyoucef Benkhedda (DZ)
- Corresponding author
- Belgacem, Linda
- Venue
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance
- Published
- 2023-02-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 59-64
- ISSN
- 0949-1775 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0517
- OpenAlex
- W4319313600
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Keywords
- cleaning validation, worst-case scenario, failure mode and effects analysis, methylparaben, detection limit, absorbance, pharmaceutical quality control, water solubility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory glassware cleaning validation in pharmaceutical industry: a case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4
- The paper
- Belgacem, L., & Cherif, R. A. (2023). Laboratory glassware cleaning validation in pharmaceutical industry: a case study. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-023-01531-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
