The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The CQL continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A catalog of stream processing optimizations
Hirzel, M., Soulé, R., Schneider, S., Gedik, B., & Grimm, R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2528412 · Cited by 299
A survey on the evolution of stream processing systems
Fragkoulis, M., Carbone, P., Kalavri, V., & Katsifodimos, A. (2024) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-023-00819-8 · Cited by 207
Querying rdf streams with c-sparql
Barbieri, D. F., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Valle, E. D., & Grossniklaus, M. (2010) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/1860702.1860705 · Cited by 178
Temporal abstraction in intelligent clinical data analysis: A survey
Stacey, M., & McGregor, C. (2007) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2006.08.002 · Cited by 146
Survey of Real-time Processing Technologies of IoT Data Streams
Yasumoto, K., Yamaguchi, H., & Shigeno, H. (2016) · Journal of Information Processing · doi:10.2197/ipsjjip.24.195 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Arasu, A., Babu, S., & Widom, J.
- Venue
- The VLDB Journal
- Published
- 2005-07-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-142
- ISSN
- 0949-877X (ISSN-L)
- 1066-8888
- OpenAlex
- W2099395665
- Cited by
- 1,170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The CQL continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00778-004-0147-z
- The paper
- Arasu, A., Babu, S., & Widom, J. (2006). The CQL continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution. The VLDB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-004-0147-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
