Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Salivary cortisol has recently been utilized for cognitive workload measurements.
“Salivary cortisol, usually used as a biological marker for stress [114], has recently been utilized for cognitive workload measurements [49].”
From A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
Normalization techniques and relying on multiple modalities may allow building more robust models.
“Normalization techniques, such as establishing baselines for the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system responses [49], as well as relying on multiple modalities, may allow building more robust models [106].”
From A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation to this paper, [106], is attached to the suggestion that multiple modalities may yield more robust models; the normalization example is separately cited to [49]. The Introduction and motivation section says the study used a single sensor modality for comfort, and the Methods and Conclusion describe models based on heart-rate-variability features. Searches for multiple modalities and improved robustness found no passage addressing that suggestion (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 235
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. Brain workshop-a dual n-back game. http://brainworkshop. sourceforge.net/
- Authors
- Cinaz, B., Arnrich, B., La Marca, R., & Tröster, G.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Cinaz, Burcu
- ORCID
- Tröster, Gerhard
- Venue
- Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 1617-4909 (ISSN-L)
- 1617-4917
- OpenAlex
- W1972131791
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Keywords
- mental workload, heart rate variability, office work, NASA-TLX, salivary cortisol, individual calibration, parasympathetic activity, sympathetic activity, workload classification, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, workplace health surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
