Cited by 58Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Anxiety and Anesthesia TechniquesDental Health and Care Utilization

Pain levels in patients during periodontal probing and mechanical non-surgical therapy

Canakci, Varol, Canakci, Cenk Fatih·2007·Clinical Oral Investigations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of pain during periodontal probing and mechanical non-surgical therapy according to age, gender, and intersubject variation such as tooth type, tooth surfaces or regions of mouth, probing depth, and bleeding on probing. The study was carried out on 64 patients with chronic periodontitis. Pain/discomfort of patients during both periodontal probing and scaling and root planing (SRP) was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). During periodontal probing and SRP, VAS scores decreased with increasing age for two procedures (Spearman rho, -0.301 and -0.348, respectively; P < 0.01). VAS scores were considerably lower for oral sites than for facial sites. VAS scores in probing were significantly higher in sites > or =4 mm deep than sites <4 mm deep. Sites bleeding on probing had a significantly higher VAS scores than sites no bleeding on probing (p < 0.05). The results showed that although there is no difference between genders, the intensity of pain during periodontal probing and SRP was different dramatically between patients as well as vary between different locations in the same mouth. If pain responses for probing in different several regions in the same mouth during initial examination were noted into patient chart used for initial examination, the therapist will recognize patients with elevated pain responses. If need be, they will then apply some pain control medication or anesthetic for patients during probing and SRP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00784-007-0126-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obtaining clinical data requires a comprehensive periodontal exam that can be uncomfortable for patients and time-consuming for clinicians.

    “Furthermore, obtaining clinical data requires a comprehensive periodontal exam which can be uncomfortable for patients and, although less important from the perspective of disease, is a time‐consuming procedure for clinicians. 34”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 58

Authors
Canakci, V., & Canakci, C. F.
Venue
Clinical Oral Investigations
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
377-383
ISSN
  • 1432-6981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-3771
OpenAlex
W2060309740
Cited by
58
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Oral Investigations (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
periodontal probing, scaling and root planing, procedural pain, chronic periodontitis, patient pain perception, age differences, bleeding on probing, probing depth, tooth location, gender differences, interindividual variability, pain management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Gingival Hemorrhage, Humans, Incisor, Male, Middle Aged, Molar, Pain, Pain Measurement, Periodontal Pocket, Periodontics, Periodontitis, Dental Scaling, Sex Factors, Root Planing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review