The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs
Open accessAbstract
A new scoring system, the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE), has been designed to provide a simple tool for use in general practice and to allow comparison to other more discriminative indices. The most severely affected surface in each sextant is recorded with a four level score and the cumulative score classified and matched to risk levels which guide the management of the condition. The BEWE allows re-analysis and integration of results from existing studies and, in time, should initiate a consensus within the scientific community and so avoid continued proliferation of indices. Finally, this process should lead to the development of an internationally accepted, standardised and validated index. The BEWE further aims to increase the awareness of tooth erosion amongst clinicians and general dental practitioners and to provide a guide as to its management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Martignon, S., Bartlett, D., Manton, D. J., Martinez-Mier, E. A., Splieth, C., & Avila, V. (2021) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000512483 · Cited by 71
Self-citationButera, A., Gallo, S., Pascadopoli, M., Montasser, M. A., Abd El Latief, M. H., Modica, G. G., & Scribante, A. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19148676 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, D., Ganss, C., & Lussi, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Investigations
- Published
- 2008-01-29
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 65-68
- ISSN
- 1432-6981 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-3771
- OpenAlex
- W2010783520
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
