Cited by 58Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Prediction of adolescent outcome in children with disruptive behaviour disorders: A study of neurobiological, psychological and family factors

van Bokhoven, Irene, Matthys, Walter, van Goozen, Stephanie H. M., van Engeland, Herman·2005·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

In this preliminary study we explored the predictive influence of various family, psychological, demographic, and neurobiological characteristics on the persistence of antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Existing data were combined with case-records in a sample of 47 disruptive behaviour disordered (DBD) children who had been treated in in-patient and/or day-treatment units when they were between seven to 12 years old. Parent-rated and self-rated externalizing problem scores and the presence of a DBD diagnosis served as the outcome measures in adolescence. We used linear regression analyses to examine the predictors of adolescent outcome. A lower basal skin conductance level (SCL) was repeatedly found to predict poor adolescent outcome, either when rated by parents or by participants themselves. In addition, comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, one aspect of performance on the door-opening task, and a mother of low socioeconomic status also predicted that a child would have more antisocial problems in adolescence, depending on the type of outcome measure. Results of this study support the fearlessness theory, according to which low activity of the autonomous nervous system, as manifested by low SCL, is related to the effectiveness of socializing punishment and accordingly to poor socialization and adolescent outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-005-0455-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 58

Authors
van Bokhoven, I., Matthys, W., van Goozen, S. H. M., & van Engeland, H.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2005-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2328874260
Cited by
58
References
52
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
disruptive behavior disorders, antisocial behavior, ADHD comorbidity, socioeconomic status, externalizing problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Socialization, Comorbidity, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review