Prediction of adolescent outcome in children with disruptive behaviour disorders: A study of neurobiological, psychological and family factors
Abstract
In this preliminary study we explored the predictive influence of various family, psychological, demographic, and neurobiological characteristics on the persistence of antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Existing data were combined with case-records in a sample of 47 disruptive behaviour disordered (DBD) children who had been treated in in-patient and/or day-treatment units when they were between seven to 12 years old. Parent-rated and self-rated externalizing problem scores and the presence of a DBD diagnosis served as the outcome measures in adolescence. We used linear regression analyses to examine the predictors of adolescent outcome. A lower basal skin conductance level (SCL) was repeatedly found to predict poor adolescent outcome, either when rated by parents or by participants themselves. In addition, comorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, one aspect of performance on the door-opening task, and a mother of low socioeconomic status also predicted that a child would have more antisocial problems in adolescence, depending on the type of outcome measure. Results of this study support the fearlessness theory, according to which low activity of the autonomous nervous system, as manifested by low SCL, is related to the effectiveness of socializing punishment and accordingly to poor socialization and adolescent outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ODD predicts reduced reactivity to punishment in children.
“Our findings support previous research that ODD predicts risk taking (Garzon et al. 2008; Schwebel et al. 2002) and reduced reactivity to punishment (Matthys et al. 2004; van Bokhoven et al. 2005).”
From Risk taking and sensitivity to punishment in children with ADHD, ODD, ADHD+ODD, and controls (2011) · cites this paper as van Bokhoven et al. 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- van Bokhoven, I., Matthys, W., van Goozen, S. H. M., & van Engeland, H.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- ORCID
- Matthys, Walter
- Venue
- European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-165X
- OpenAlex
- W2328874260
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- disruptive behavior disorders, antisocial behavior, ADHD comorbidity, socioeconomic status, externalizing problems
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Cognition Disorders, Demography, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Socialization, Comorbidity, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review