Cited by 64Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Screening for anxiety disorders in children

Open access
Simon, Ellin, Bögels, Susan Maria·2009·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and have negative consequences on individual and societal level. This study examined the usefulness of screening for anxiety disorders in primary school children. More specifically, the value of the screening method to discriminate between and to predict anxiety disorders was studied. Children and their parents were selected if the children had self-reported scores on the screening questionnaire Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders-71 (SCARED-71) within the top-15% (High-anxious) or from two points below to two points above the median (Median-anxious). Of the selected children, 183 high-anxious children and their parents, and 80 median-anxious children and their parents took part in a diagnostic interview, the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS). Of the high-anxious children, 60% had an anxiety disorder versus 23% of the median-anxious children, whereas groups did not differ on rates of dysthymia/depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The diagnoses separation anxiety disorder, social phobia and specific phobia were specifically predicted by the corresponding subscales of the screening questionnaire, while the diagnosis generalised anxiety disorder was not predicted by any of the subscales. The screening method has proven its utility for discriminating between children with and without anxiety disorders when applying the top-15% cut-off. Moreover, separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, and specific phobia, all known to be prevalent and debilitating childhood anxiety disorders, can be predicted by the corresponding subscale of the screening instrument.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-009-0023-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In children aged 8-12 years diagnosed with a specific phobia, phobia of the dark was the most prevalent type (27%).

    “In children aged 8–12 years who were diagnosed with a specific phobia (n = 95), phobia of the dark was the most prevalent (27%) type (Simon & Bögels, 2009).”

    From Challenging anxious cognitions or accepting them? Exploring the efficacy of the cognitive elements of cognitive behaviour therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy in the reduction of children's fear of the dark (2020) · cites this paper as Simon & Bögels, 2009

    The Results section reports that fear of the dark was the most frequently diagnosed specific phobia among 95 high-anxious children with specific phobia (27%; n = 26). The Methods section says participants were aged 8–13, not 8–12, and the reported percentage pertains specifically to the high-anxious group. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The SCARED-71 is a useful anxiety screening tool in primary school children, discriminating between children with and without anxiety disorders and predicting separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, and specific phobia.

    “The SCARED-71 was found to be a useful anxiety screening tool in primary school children, because the instrument discriminates between children with and without an anxiety disorders and predicts specifically separation anxiety disorder, social phobia and specific phobia (Simon and Bögels 2009).”

    From Psychological Inflexibility and Child Anxiety. (2016) · cites this paper as Simon and Bögels 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 64

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Hien D Matzner FJ First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-child edition (version 1.0) 1998 New York Columbia University Hien D, Matzner FJ, First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1998) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-child edition (version 1.0). Columbia University, New York

Authors
Simon, E., & Bögels, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Simon, Ellin
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2009-05-05
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
625-634
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W2117422054
Cited by
64
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
ZonMw (22000138)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
childhood anxiety disorders, screening, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, diagnostic accuracy, cut-off values, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Netherlands, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Somatoform Disorders, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review