Cited by 168Origins and Evolution of LifeAsymmetric Synthesis and CatalysisChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies

Stochastic and empirical models of the absolute asymmetric synthesis by the Soai-autocatalysis

Open access
Barabás, Béla, Zucchi, Claudia, Maioli, Marco, Micskei, Károly, Pályi, Gyula·2015·Journal of Molecular Modeling

Abstract

Absolute asymmetric synthesis (AAS) is the preparation of pure (or excess of one) enantiomer of a chiral compound from achiral precursor(s) by a chemical reaction, without enantiopure chiral additive and/or without applied asymmetric physical field. Only one well-characterized example of AAS is known today: the Soai-autocatalysis. In an attempt at clarification of the mechanism of this particular reaction we have undertaken empirical and stochastic analysis of several parallel AAS experiments. Our results show that the initial steps of the reaction might be controlled by simple normal distribution ("coin tossing") formalism. Advanced stages of the reaction, however, appear to be of a more complicated nature. Symmetric beta distribution formalism could not be brought into correspondence with the experimental observations. A bimodal beta distribution algorithm provided suitable agreement with the experimental data. The parameters of this bimodal beta function were determined by a Pólya-urn experiment (simulated by computer). Interestingly, parameters of the resulting bimodal beta function give a golden section ratio. These results show, that in this highly interesting autocatalysis two or even perhaps three catalytic cycles are cooperating. An attempt at constructing a "designed" Soai-type reaction system has also been made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00894-015-2576-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The outcome of the Soai reaction in absence of detectable chiral species is stochastic.

    “In addition, the apparent outcome of the Soai reaction performed in the absence of detectable chiral species is stochastic as expected for a truly SMSB process”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 133 · Cited by 168

Authors
Barabás, B., Zucchi, C., Maioli, M., Micskei, K., & Pályi, G.
Affiliations
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
Corresponding author
Pályi, Gyula
Venue
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Published
2015-02
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
33-33
ISSN
  • 0948-5023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-2940
OpenAlex
W2020191021
Cited by
168
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 24
FWCI
22.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Keywords
absolute asymmetric synthesis, Pólya urn model, reaction mechanism, enantiomeric excess, catalytic cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review