Stochastic and empirical models of the absolute asymmetric synthesis by the Soai-autocatalysis
Open accessAbstract
Absolute asymmetric synthesis (AAS) is the preparation of pure (or excess of one) enantiomer of a chiral compound from achiral precursor(s) by a chemical reaction, without enantiopure chiral additive and/or without applied asymmetric physical field. Only one well-characterized example of AAS is known today: the Soai-autocatalysis. In an attempt at clarification of the mechanism of this particular reaction we have undertaken empirical and stochastic analysis of several parallel AAS experiments. Our results show that the initial steps of the reaction might be controlled by simple normal distribution ("coin tossing") formalism. Advanced stages of the reaction, however, appear to be of a more complicated nature. Symmetric beta distribution formalism could not be brought into correspondence with the experimental observations. A bimodal beta distribution algorithm provided suitable agreement with the experimental data. The parameters of this bimodal beta function were determined by a Pólya-urn experiment (simulated by computer). Interestingly, parameters of the resulting bimodal beta function give a golden section ratio. These results show, that in this highly interesting autocatalysis two or even perhaps three catalytic cycles are cooperating. An attempt at constructing a "designed" Soai-type reaction system has also been made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The outcome of the Soai reaction in absence of detectable chiral species is stochastic.
“In addition, the apparent outcome of the Soai reaction performed in the absence of detectable chiral species is stochastic as expected for a truly SMSB process”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [330]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 133 · Cited by 168
- Authors
- Barabás, B., Zucchi, C., Maioli, M., Micskei, K., & Pályi, G.
- Affiliations
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU)
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
- University of Debrecen (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Pályi, Gyula
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Modeling
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 33-33
- ISSN
- 0948-5023 (ISSN-L)
- 1610-2940
- OpenAlex
- W2020191021
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 24
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- link.springer.com
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Modeling (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
- Keywords
- absolute asymmetric synthesis, Pólya urn model, reaction mechanism, enantiomeric excess, catalytic cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review