Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrogen Removal by Riparian Buffers along a European Climatic Gradient: Patterns and Factors of Variation

Open access
Sabater, Sergi, Butturini, Andrea, Clement, Jean-Christophe, Burt, Tim, Dowrick, David, Hefting, Mariet, Matre, Véronique, Pinay, Gilles, Postolache, Carmen, Rzepecki, Marek, Sabater, Francesc·2003·Ecosystems

Abstract

AbstractWe evaluated nitrogen (N) removal efficiency by riparian buffers at 14 sites scattered throughout seven European countries subject to a wide range of climatic conditions. The sites also had a wide range of nitrate inputs, soil characteristics, and vegetation types. Dissolved forms of N in groundwater and associated hydrological parameters were measured at all sites; these data were used to calculate nitrate removal by the riparian buffers. Nitrate removal rates (expressed as the difference between the input and output nitrate concentration in relation to the width of the riparian zone) were mainly positive, ranging from 5% m−1 to 30% m−1, except for a few sites where the values were close to zero. Average N removal rates were similar for herbaceous (4.43% m−1) and forested (4.21% m−1) sites. Nitrogen removal efficiency was not affected by climatic variation between sites, and no significant seasonal pattern was detected. When nitrate inputs were low, a very large range of nitrate removal efficiencies was found both in the forested and in the nonforested sites. However, sites receiving nitrate inputs above 5 mg N L−1 showed an exponential negative decay of nitrate removal efficiency (nitrate removal efficiency = 33.6 e−0.11 NO3input, r2 = 0.33, P < 0.001). Hydraulic gradient was also negatively related to nitrate removal (r = −0.27, P < 0.05) at these sites. On the basis of this intersite comparison, we conclude that the removal of nitrate by biological mechanisms (for example, denitrification, plant uptake) in the riparian areas is related more closely to nitrate load and hydraulic gradient than to climatic parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-002-0183-8

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Sabater, S., Butturini, A., Clement, J.-C., Burt, T., Dowrick, D., Hefting, M., Matre, V., Pinay, G., Postolache, C., Rzepecki, M., & Sabater, F.
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2003-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
0020-0030
ISSN
1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044739657
Cited by
262
References
37
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen Removal by Riparian Buffers along a European Climatic Gradient: Patterns and Factors of Variation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10021-002-0183-8
The paper
Sabater, S., Butturini, A., Clement, J.-C., Burt, T., Dowrick, D., Hefting, M., Matre, V., Pinay, G., Postolache, C., Rzepecki, M., & Sabater, F. (2003). Nitrogen Removal by Riparian Buffers along a European Climatic Gradient: Patterns and Factors of Variation. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0183-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.