Cited by 204Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Alteration of Ecosystem Function by Zebra Mussels in Oneida Lake: Impacts on Submerged Macrophytes

Zhu, B., Fitzgerald, D. G., Mayer, C. M., Rudstam, L. G., Mills, E. L.·2006·Ecosystems

Abstract

Dreissenid mussels (the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha and the quagga mussel D. bugensis) are ecosystem engineers that modify the physical environment by increasing light penetration. Such a change is likely to affect the distribution and diversity of submerged macrophytes. Filter-feeding by these mussels has been associated with increased water clarity in many North American and European lakes. In this study, we report the increase in water clarity of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, for 1975-2002 and argue that the increase was caused by zebra mussel invasion rather than declines in nutrients. Over the study period, although mean total phosphorus decreased significantly, the main increase in water clarity occurred after the zebra mussel invasion in 1991. The average depth receiving 1% surface light increased from 6.7 m to 7.8 m after the invasion of zebra mussels, representing a 23% areal expansion. The maximum depth of macrophyte colonization, as measured by diver and hydroacoustic surveys, increased from 3.0 m before the invasion of zebra mussels to 5.1 m after their establishment. In addition, macrophyte species richness increased, the frequency of occurrence increased for most species, and the composition of the macrophyte community changed from low-light-tolerant species to those tolerating a wide range of light conditions. Comparisons with observations reported in the literature indicate that increased light penetration alone could explain these changes in macrophyte di…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-005-0049-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, B., Fitzgerald, D. G., Mayer, C. M., Rudstam, L. G., & Mills, E. L.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhu, B.
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2006-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1028
ISSN
  • 1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0629
OpenAlex
W2061948019
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
Dreissena polymorpha, quagga mussel, Dreissena bugensis, invasive species, ecosystem engineers, submerged macrophytes, water transparency, light penetration, macrophyte community composition, phosphorus, Oneida Lake, benthic primary production, food webs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review