The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Two Tropical Forests: Ecosystem-Level Patterns and Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization
Open accessAbstract
Humid tropical forests are often characterized by large nitrogen (N) pools, and are known to have large potential N losses. Although rarely measured, tropical forests likely maintain considerable biological N fixation (BNF) to balance N losses. We estimated inputs of N via BNF by free-living microbes for two tropical forests in Puerto Rico, and assessed the response to increased N availability using an on-going N fertilization experiment. Nitrogenase activity was measured across forest strata, including the soil, forest floor, mosses, canopy epiphylls, and lichens using acetylene (C 2 H 2 ) reduction assays. BNF varied significantly among ecosystem compartments in both forests. Mosses had the highest rates of nitrogenase activity per gram of sample, with 11 ± 6 nmol C 2 H 2 reduced/g dry weight/h (mean ± SE) in a lower elevation forest, and 6 ± 1 nmol C 2 H 2 /g/h in an upper elevation forest. We calculated potential N fluxes via BNF to each forest compartment using surveys of standing stocks. Soils and mosses provided the largest potential inputs of N via BNF to these ecosystems. Summing all components, total background BNF inputs were 120 ± 29 μg N/m 2 /h in the lower elevation forest, and 95 ± 15 μg N/m 2 /h in the upper elevation forest, with added N significantly suppressing BNF in soils and forest floor. Moisture content was significantly positively correlated with BNF rates for soils and the forest floor. We conclude that BNF is an active biological process across forest strata for these tropical forests, and is likely to be sensitive to increases in N deposition in tropical regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., et al. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0 · Cited by 5,315
HETEROTROPHIC NITROGEN FIXATION IN DECOMPOSING LITTER: PATTERNS AND REGULATION
Vitousek, P. M., & Hobbie, S. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2366:hnfidl]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., & Richter, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022 · Cited by 930
Functional Ecology of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixation: A Contemporary Perspective
Reed, S. C., Cleveland, C. C., & Townsend, A. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145034 · Cited by 718
Harter, J., Krause, H.-M., Schuettler, S., Ruser, R., Fromme, M., Scholten, T., Kappler, A., & Behrens, S. (2014) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.160 · Cited by 679
Reef, R., Feller, I. C., & Lovelock, C. E. (2010) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpq048 · Cited by 639
Cusack, D. F., Silver, W. L., Torn, M. S., Burton, S. D., & Firestone, M. K. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-0459.1 · Cited by 462
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cusack, D. F., Silver, W., & McDowell, W. H.
- Venue
- Ecosystems
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1299-1315
- ISSN
- 1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0629
- OpenAlex
- W2011348215
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Two Tropical Forests: Ecosystem-Level Patterns and Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10021-009-9290-0
- The paper
- Cusack, D. F., Silver, W., & McDowell, W. H. (2009). Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Two Tropical Forests: Ecosystem-Level Patterns and Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9290-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.