Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aslani, N., Brown, C. J.·2010·Hernia
DOI 10.1007/s10029-010-0705-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10029-010-0705-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Muschaweck U (2003) Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83:1207–1221 · DOI
  2. Velasco M, Gracia-Ureña M, Hidalgo M, Vega V, Carnerol F (1999) Current concepts on adult umbilical hernia. Hernia 3:233–239 · DOI
  3. Bachman S, Ramshaw B (2008) Prosthetic material in ventral hernia repair: how do I choose? Surg Clin North Am 88:101–112 · DOI
  4. García-Ureña M, Rico Selas P, Seoane J, Marcello M, Moreno González E, Corral Sánchez M, Moreno Sanz C (1994) Hernia umbilical del adulto. Resultados a largo plazo en pacientes operados de urgencia. Cir Esp 56:302–306
  5. Askar OM (1978) A new concept of the aetiology and surgical repair of paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 60:42–48
  6. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester
  7. Chi CC, Lee CW, Wojnarowska F, Kirtschig G (2009) Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD007346 · DOI
  8. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2000) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews. Beyond the Basics: Improving Quality and Impact, July 2000, Oxford, UK
  9. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc 17:2016–2020 · DOI
  10. Wright BE, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming JK, Rodriguez JL (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–508 · DOI
  11. Abdel-Baki NA, Bessa SS, Abdel-Razek AH (2007) Comparison of prosthetic mesh repair and tissue repair in the emergency management of incarcerated para-umbilical hernia: a prospective randomized study. Hernia 11:163–167 · DOI
  12. Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323 · DOI
  13. Polat C, Dervisoglu A, Senyurek G, Bilgin M, Erzurumlu K, Ozkan K (2005) Umbilical hernia repair with the Prolene hernia system. Am J Surg 190:61–64 · DOI
  14. Asolati M, Huerta S, Sarosi G, Harmon R, Bell C, Anthony T (2006) Predictors of recurrence in veteran patients with umbilical hernia: single center experience. Am J Surg 192:627–630 · DOI
  15. Bowley DMG, Kingsnorth AN (2000) Umbilical hernia, Mayo or mesh? Hernia 4:195–196 · DOI
  16. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Tekelioglu MH (2006) Which repair in umbilical hernia of adults: primary or mesh? Int Surg 91:258–261
  17. Farrow B, Awad S, Berger DH, Albo D, Lee L, Subramanian A, Bellows CF (2008) More than 150 consecutive open umbilical hernia repairs in a major Veterans Administration Medical Center. Am J Surg 196:647–651 · DOI
  18. Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9:334–337 · DOI
  19. Kamer E, Unalp HR, Derici H, Tansug T, Onal MA (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accompanied by simultaneous umbilical hernia repair: a retrospective study. J Postgrad Med 53:176–180 · DOI
  20. Sanjay P, Reid TD, Davies EL, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A (2005) Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9:248–251 · DOI
  21. Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M (2008) Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 44:855–859 · DOI
  22. Scott N, Go PMNYH, Graham P, McCormack K, Ross SJ, Grant A (2001) Open mesh versus non-mesh for groin hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002197 · DOI
  23. den Hartog D, Dur AHM, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2008) Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD006438 · DOI
  24. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2003) A cost–utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients. Surg Endosc 17:180–189 · DOI
  25. Israelsson LA, Jönsson L, Wimo A (2003) Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture or mesh. Hernia 7:114–117 · DOI
  26. Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-García J, Seco-Gil JL (2007) Antibiotic prophylaxis for hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD003769 · DOI
  27. Luijendijk RW, Lemmen MH, Hop WC, Wereldsma JC (1997) Incisional hernia recurrence following “vest-over-pants” or vertical Mayo repair of primary hernias of the midline. World J Surg 21:62–65 · DOI
  28. Rosen MJ (2010) Biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction: a critical appraisal. Am Surg 76:1–6 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aslani, N., & Brown, C. J.
Venue
Hernia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-07-16
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
455-462
ISSN
  • 1265-4906
  • 1248-9204
DOI
10.1007/s10029-010-0705-9
Cited by
99
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.