Cited by 16Social Robot Interaction and HRIEmotion and Mood RecognitionVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

Human perception of a conversational virtual human: An empirical study on the effect of emotion and culture

Qu, Chao, Brinkman, Willem-Paul, Ling, Yun, Wiggers, Pascal, Heynderickx, Ingrid·2013·Virtual Reality

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10055-013-0231-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 100 · Cited by 16

Authors
Qu, C., Brinkman, W.-P., Ling, Y., Wiggers, P., & Heynderickx, I.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Qu, Chao
Venue
Virtual Reality
Published
2013-08-30
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
307-321
ISSN
  • 1359-4338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-9957
OpenAlex
W2035703570
Cited by
16
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Virtual Reality (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
emotional expression, emotional valence, Chinese participants, virtual reality applications, virtual reality exposure therapy, health coaches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review