Acceptance of dance training system based on augmented reality and technology acceptance model (TAM)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings are consistent with the original TAM and previous AR technology acceptance studies.
“These findings were consistent with the original TAM [49] and previous AR technology acceptance studies [89,90].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Iqbal, J., & Sidhu, M. S.
- Affiliations
- UCSI University (MY)
- Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Iqbal, Javid
- Venue
- Virtual Reality
- Published
- 2021-05-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-54
- ISSN
- 1359-4338 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-9957
- OpenAlex
- W3164740582
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Virtual Reality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Multimedia Learning Systems
- Keywords
- augmented reality, dance training, technology acceptance model, user acceptance, constructivism, Dreyfus model, learning retention, learning efficiency, self-directed learning, dance education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
