Experiences and attitudes of Dutch rheumatologists and oncologists with regard to their patients’ health-related Internet use
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to explore the experiences and attitudes of rheumatologists and oncologists with regard to their patients' health-related Internet use. In addition, we explored how often physicians referred their patients to health-related Internet sites. We sent a questionnaire to all the rheumatologists and oncologists in the Netherlands. The questionnaire included questions concerning demographics, experiences with patients' health-related Internet use, referral behavior, and attitudes to the consequences of patients' health-related Internet use (for patients themselves, the physician-patient relationship and the health care). The response rate was 46% (N=238). Of these respondents, 134 practiced as a rheumatologist and 104 as an oncologist. Almost all physicians encountered their patients raising information from the Internet during a consultation. They were not, however, confronted with their patients' health-related Internet use on a daily basis. Physicians had a moderately positive attitude towards the consequences of patients' health-related Internet use, the physician-patient relationship and the health care. Oncologists were significantly less positive than rheumatologists about the consequences of health-related Internet use. Most of the physicians had never (32%) or only sometimes (42%) referred a patient to a health-related Internet site. Most physicians (53%) found it difficult to stay up-to-date with reliable Internet sites for patients. Physicians are moderately positive about their patients' health-related Internet use but only seldom refer them to relevant sites. Offering an up-to-date site with accredited websites for patients might help physicians refer their patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is conflicting evidence on how online health information seeking affects patient-provider relationships.
“Despite the popularity of online health information seeking, there is conflicting evidence on how it affects patient-provider relationships.”
From Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
Participants reported that HCPs had mixed reactions to information from OHCs and social media sites.
“As with traditional online sources, participants reported that HCPs had mixed reactions to information from OHCs and social media sites.[14,16–19]”
From Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H. C., Taal, E., Smit, W. M., Seydel, E. R., & van de Laar, M. A. F. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente (NL)
- Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
- Venue
- Clinical Rheumatology
- Published
- 2010-04-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1229-1236
- ISSN
- 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-9949
- PMC
- PMC2943066
- OpenAlex
- W2039788776
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Dutch Arthritis Association
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Keywords
- health-related internet use, physician attitudes, rheumatologists, oncologists, physician-patient relationship, patient information seeking, chronic disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Communication, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Medical Oncology, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Rheumatology, Internet, Consumer Health Information
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review