Cited by 48Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Psychological factors mediate key symptoms of fibromyalgia through their influence on stress

Malin, Katrina, Littlejohn, Geoffrey Owen·2016·Clinical Rheumatology

Abstract

The clinical features of fibromyalgia are associated with various psychological factors, including stress. We examined the hypothesis that the path that psychological factors follow in influencing fibromyalgia symptoms is through their direct effect on stress. Ninety-eight females with ACR 1990 classified fibromyalgia completed the following questionnaires: The Big 5 Personality Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, Profile of Mood States, Mastery Scale, and Perceived Control of Internal States Scale. SPSS (PASW version 22) was used to perform basic t tests, means, and standard deviations to show difference between symptom characteristics. Pathway analysis using structural equation modelling (Laavan) examined the effect of stress on the relationships between psychological factors and the elements that define the fibromyalgia phenotype. The preferred model showed that the identified path clearly linked the psychological variables of anxiety, neuroticism and mastery, but not internal control, to the three key elements of fibromyalgia, namely pain, fatigue and sleep (p < 0.001), via the person's perceived stress. Confusion, however, did not fit the preferred model. This study confirms that stress is a necessary link in the pathway between certain identified, established and significant psychological factors and key fibromyalgia symptoms. This has implications for the understanding of contributing mechanisms and the clinical care of patients with fibromyalgia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10067-016-3315-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study confirms the significant association between perceived stress and somatic symptom burden, manifesting as increased pain, anxiety, depression and general deterioration in health.

    “In line with previous research, this study confirms the significant association between perceived stress and somatic symptom burden, manifesting as increased pain, anxiety, depression and a general deterioration in health, highlighting the profound impact of stress in fibromyalgia populations (Malin and Littlejohn 2016; Beiner et al. 2024).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malin, K., & Littlejohn, G. O.
Affiliations
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Malin, Katrina
Venue
Clinical Rheumatology
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
2353-2357
ISSN
  • 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-9949
OpenAlex
W2419343722
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, psychological factors, perceived stress, anxiety, neuroticism, mastery, internal control, pain, fatigue, sleep, Big Five personality traits
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Fatigue, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review