Competency-based medical education for the clinician-educator: the coming of Milestones version 2
Abstract
Competency-based medical education is emphasized by institutions overseeing medical school and postgraduate training worldwide. The high rate of preventable errors in medicine underscores this need. Expanding physician competency beyond the domains of patient care and medical knowledge towards goals that emphasize a more holistic view of the healthcare system is one aspect of this emphasis. The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which oversees postgraduate training programs in the USA, has recently expanded to oversee training programs internationally. The original ACGME Milestones effort unveiled in 2013 was met with skepticism. Nevertheless, other outcomes-based education programs worldwide, including the CanMEDS framework (Canada), Tomorrow's Doctor (UK), and Scottish Doctor (Scotland), have suggested that milestones do offer advantages. Missing from the milestone rollout, however, was collaborative buy-in from multiple stakeholders such as from clinician-educators. Consequently, Milestones version 2 is in development. Specifically, these will address the need for specialty-specific milestones, and the usage of harmonized milestones. A concise history of the push towards outcomes-based medical education is presented and contextualized for physicians who must embrace the transition from teacher-based to learner-based outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By establishing clear benchmarks, competency-based frameworks guide educators and learners toward targeted professional growth, ensuring assessments focus on critical competencies.
“By establishing clear benchmarks, these frameworks guide both educators and learners toward targeted professional growth, ensuring assessments focus on critical competencies [45,46].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
Competency-based frameworks such as ACGME milestones provide a structured foundation for evaluating essential skills, knowledge, and attitudes.
“Competency-based frameworks, such as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones, provide a structured foundation for evaluating essential skills, knowledge, and attitudes.”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Torralba, K. D., Jose, D., & Katz, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Torralba, Karina D
- Venue
- Clinical Rheumatology
- Published
- 2020-02-13
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1719-1723
- ISSN
- 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
- 1434-9949
- OpenAlex
- W3006188990
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Keywords
- competency-based medical education, ACGME milestones, clinician educators, graduate medical education, outcome-based education, CanMEDS framework, preventable medical errors, stakeholder buy-in
- MeSH terms
- Accreditation, Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Humans, Internship and Residency, Societies, Medical, Specialization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review