Cited by 22Innovations in Medical EducationMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationHealth and Medical Education

Competency-based medical education for the clinician-educator: the coming of Milestones version 2

Torralba, Karina D, Jose, Donna, Katz, James D.·2020·Clinical Rheumatology

Abstract

Competency-based medical education is emphasized by institutions overseeing medical school and postgraduate training worldwide. The high rate of preventable errors in medicine underscores this need. Expanding physician competency beyond the domains of patient care and medical knowledge towards goals that emphasize a more holistic view of the healthcare system is one aspect of this emphasis. The Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which oversees postgraduate training programs in the USA, has recently expanded to oversee training programs internationally. The original ACGME Milestones effort unveiled in 2013 was met with skepticism. Nevertheless, other outcomes-based education programs worldwide, including the CanMEDS framework (Canada), Tomorrow's Doctor (UK), and Scottish Doctor (Scotland), have suggested that milestones do offer advantages. Missing from the milestone rollout, however, was collaborative buy-in from multiple stakeholders such as from clinician-educators. Consequently, Milestones version 2 is in development. Specifically, these will address the need for specialty-specific milestones, and the usage of harmonized milestones. A concise history of the push towards outcomes-based medical education is presented and contextualized for physicians who must embrace the transition from teacher-based to learner-based outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10067-020-04942-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By establishing clear benchmarks, competency-based frameworks guide educators and learners toward targeted professional growth, ensuring assessments focus on critical competencies.

    “By establishing clear benchmarks, these frameworks guide both educators and learners toward targeted professional growth, ensuring assessments focus on critical competencies [45,46].”
  • Competency-based frameworks such as ACGME milestones provide a structured foundation for evaluating essential skills, knowledge, and attitudes.

    “Competency-based frameworks, such as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones, provide a structured foundation for evaluating essential skills, knowledge, and attitudes.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 22

Authors
Torralba, K. D., Jose, D., & Katz, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Torralba, Karina D
Venue
Clinical Rheumatology
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1719-1723
ISSN
  • 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-9949
OpenAlex
W3006188990
Cited by
22
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
competency-based medical education, ACGME milestones, clinician educators, graduate medical education, outcome-based education, CanMEDS framework, preventable medical errors, stakeholder buy-in
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Humans, Internship and Residency, Societies, Medical, Specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review