Cited by 141Nutrition and Health in AgingSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

Maximal Isometric Muscle Strength: Normative Values and Gender-Specific Relation to Age

Stoll, T., Huber, E., Seifert, B., Michel, B. A., Stucki, G.·2000·Clinical Rheumatology

Abstract

To date, there have been very few studies on the age dependence of maximal isometric muscle strength (MIMS) in healthy subjects aged 20-80 years, based upon measurements of a large number of functional muscle groups (FMGs). Using a hand-held pull gauge it is possible to measure MIMS of nearly every FMG. The objectives of this study were to obtain normative values for MIMS, to evaluate differences in MIMS in relation to gender and body side and to compare the age dependence of muscle strength between women and men. In a convenience sample of 290 healthy women (aged 20-82 years) and 253 men (aged 21-79 years), MIMS of 51 FMGs was measured. For each FMG the age dependence of MIMS was depicted, side and gender specific, as percentile curves and was analysed using linear quantile regression analysis. MIMS was found to be significantly higher in men than in women and higher on the right than on the left side. A biphasic model with linear equations for strength medians was derived for each gender. The age at transition from phase 1 to phase 2 was 55 years (SD 8) for women and 49 years (SD 13) for men. During phase 1, MIMS did not decrease significantly. During phase 2, MIMS decreased in all FMGs in both genders with a steeper slope in women (-0.92) than in men (-0.63). The age dependence of MIMS differed significantly between women and men. The present study gives gender-specific equations which enable one to calculate normative values for MIMS, as measured with a pull gauge, based upon age. These normative values will allow an objective assessment of patients with diminished muscle strength as, for example, in myositis, rheumatoid arthritis and nerve root compression syndromes or in the elderly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s100670050026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing performance gap between males and females as upper body strength becomes more critical for performance is likely explained to a large extent by males having disproportionately greater strength in their upper compared to lower body, while females show the inverse.

    “The increasing performance gap between males and females as upper body strength becomes more critical for performance is likely explained to a large extent by the observation that males have disproportionately greater strength in their upper compared to lower body, while females show the inverse [44, 45].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 141

Authors
Stoll, T., Huber, E., Seifert, B., Michel, B. A., & Stucki, G.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Clinical Rheumatology
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
105-113
ISSN
  • 0770-3198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1434-9949
OpenAlex
W2078810011
Cited by
141
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
reference values, age-related muscle strength decline, sex differences, percentile curves, linear quantile regression, healthy adults, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review