Cited by 85Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Critical Roasting Level Determines Bioactive Content and Antioxidant Activity of Robusta Coffee Beans

Open access
Herawati, Dian, Giriwono, Puspo Edi, Dewi, Fitriya Nur Annisa, Kashiwagi, Takehiro, Andarwulan, Nuri·2019·Food Science and Biotechnology

Abstract

Indonesian Lampung Robusta coffee green beans were roasted at eight roasting levels (green bean, early yellow, brown, 1st crack done, very light, light, medium, and dark), followed by grinding and brewing. The physical properties of ground coffee and chemical properties of brewed coffee were analyzed. The resulting data were mapped in order to investigate the critical roasting level. It was observed that major alterations for physicochemical properties of coffee happened after "first crack" roasting level (when water activity (Aw) of bean decreased from 0.22 to 0.15). This cracking is defined as popping sound of the bean during roasting. Continuous formation of melanoidins under low Aw (< 0.15) was followed by slow degradation of chlorogenic acid (5-CQA) and total phenolic compounds. Caffeine was stable during roasting, while antioxidant activity slightly decreased. The "first crack" was determined to be the critical roasting level to produce roasted coffee beans containing high concentrations of phenolics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10068-018-0442-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 85

Authors
Herawati, D., Giriwono, P. E., Dewi, F. N. A., Kashiwagi, T., & Andarwulan, N.
Affiliations
  • IPB University (ID)
  • University of Kochi (JP)
Corresponding author
Andarwulan, Nuri
Venue
Food Science and Biotechnology
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
7-14
ISSN
  • 1226-7708 (ISSN-L)
  • 2092-6456
OpenAlex
W2883509430
Cited by
85
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia (079/SP2H/LT/DRPM/II/2016, February 17th 2016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
coffee roasting, Coffea canephora, first crack, melanoidins, chlorogenic acid, total phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, water activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review