Changing within-trial array location and target object position enhances rats’ (Rattus norvegicus) missing object recognition accuracy
Abstract
Six rats were trained to find a previously missing target or 'jackpot' object in a square array of four identical or different objects (the test segment of a trial) after first visiting and collecting sunflower seeds from under the other three objects (the study segment of a trial). During training, objects' local positions within the array and their global positions within the larger foraging array were varied over trials but were not changed between segments within a trial. Following this training, rats were tested on their accuracy for finding the target object when a trial's test array was sometimes moved to a different location in the foraging arena or when the position of the target object within the test array had been changed. Either of these manipulations initially slightly reduced rats' accuracy for finding the missing object but then enhanced it. Relocating test arrays of identical objects enhanced rats' performance only after 10-min inter-segment intervals (ISIs). Relocating test arrays of different objects enhanced rats' performance only after 2-min ISIs. Rats also improved their performance when they encountered the target object in a new position in test arrays of different objects. This enhancement effect occurred after either 2- or 30-min ISIs. These findings suggest that rats separately retrieved a missing (target) object's spatial and non-spatial information when they were relevant but not when they were irrelevant in a trial. The enhancement effects provide evidence for rats' limited retrieval capacity in their visuo-spatial working memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared to identical objects, the application of distinct objects in the NOP sample trial is likely to involve not only novel object identity, but also inter-object relationship, and presumably activates brain regions for object-object and/or object-context association more than for object identity.
“Compared to the application of identical objects, that of distinct objects is likely to involve not only novel object identity, but also inter-object relationship (Arain et al., 2012), which presumably activates brain regions for the processing of object-object and/or object-context association more than that for object identity.”
From The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties (2020) · cites this paper as Arain et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Arain, M., Parameswaran, V., & Cohen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Windsor (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Jerome
- ORCID
- Cohen, Jerome
- Venue
- Animal Cognition
- Published
- 2012-04-26
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 771-782
- ISSN
- 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-9456
- OpenAlex
- W2101800237
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- visuospatial working memory, rats, spatial memory, object location, memory retrieval, foraging behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Exploratory Behavior, Male, Space Perception, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review