Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain “rescue” behavior in rats
Abstract
Ben-Ami Bartal et al. (Science 334:1427-1430, 2011) showed that a rat in an open space (free rat) would touch the front door of a restraining tube to open its rear door, thereby enabling a rat trapped within (trapped rat) to enter a larger space that was farther away from the free rat. Since opening the rear door distanced the trapped rat from the free rat, Ben-Ami Bartal et al. argued free-rat behavior could not be motivated by the pursuit of social contact. Instead, this rat was empathically motivated, its goal being to reduce the presumed distress of the rat trapped in the restraining tube. In two experiments, we show that (a) a free rat will not learn to touch the front door to open the rear door when it is the first condition of the experiment; (b) over time, a trapped rat will often return to a restraining tube despite its presumed aversiveness; and (c) a free rat experienced in touching the front door will continue to touch it even if touching does not free the trapped rat. We explain these results and Ben-Ami Bartal et al.'s in terms of two processes, neophobia and the pursuit of social contact. When first placed in a restraining tube, neophobia causes the trapped rat to escape the tube when the rear door is opened. Across sessions, neophobia diminishes, permitting the rats' pursuit of social contact to emerge and dominate free- and trapped-rat behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prosocial effects are evident in pair-bonded voles and familiar female mice, but not between strangers or in male mice; this may also generalize to rats.
“First, prosocial effects are evident in pair-bonded voles and familiar female mice, but not between strangers or in male mice; this may also generalize to rats42 (but see25).”
From Insular cortex mediates approach and avoidance responses to social affective stimuli (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
Some paradigms require learning or direct exposure to a conspecific in pain, making it difficult to isolate social affective processes from other motivations.
“However, some paradigms require learning or direct exposure to a conspecific in pain, making it difficult to isolate social affective processes from other motivations21,25.”
From Insular cortex mediates approach and avoidance responses to social affective stimuli (2018) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Silberberg, A., Allouch, C., Sandfort, S., Kearns, D., Karpel, H., & Slotnick, B.
- Affiliations
- American University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Silberberg, Alan
- Venue
- Animal Cognition
- Published
- 2013-10-15
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 609-618
- ISSN
- 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-9456
- OpenAlex
- W1983342568
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 15.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- rescue behavior, social contact, empathy, neophobia, rats, social behavior, aversive experience
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Empathy, Female, Helping Behavior, Social Behavior, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review