Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motoneuron disease after electric injury: a case report

Zoccolella, Stefano, Masi, Gianluca, Mezzapesa, Domenico, Carnicella, Francesco, Iliceto, Giovanni, Lamberti, Paolo, Serlenga, Luigi·2008·Neurological Sciences
DOI 10.1007/s10072-008-0860-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Several cases of motor neuron disease (MND) after electric injury have been reported in the last number of years, but the relationship between electric injury and MND remains controversial. Herein we report the case of a 60-year-old man who developed a MND following an electrical trauma. In the case presented here, the onset of disease at the site of lightning strike and the short interval of time between the electrical injury and the clinical onset of MND raise the possibility of considering electrical shock as a trigger factor for MND.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-008-0860-2

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zoccolella, S., Masi, G., Mezzapesa, D., Carnicella, F., Iliceto, G., Lamberti, P., & Serlenga, L.
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
47-49
ISSN
  • 1590-1874
  • 1590-3478
DOI
10.1007/s10072-008-0860-2
Cited by
14
References
13
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.