Long-term impact of mild traumatic brain injury on postural stability and executive function
Abstract
Objective A substantial number of individuals present with prolonged symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or concussion. This has warranted the development of assessment tools that can reliably detect prolonged symptoms after an mTBI. At present, a gold standard diagnostic tool for accurately identifying such prolonged symptoms is not available. The purpose of this study is to utilize specific measures of standing balance, cognitive function, and bimanual coordination to examine persisting long-term deficits in individuals with mTBI. Methods A total of 18 (medically diagnosed with an mTBI within the last year) and 14 (healthy age-matched controls) individuals participated in the study. Assessment tools included NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB), TEMPA, and Purdue pegboard (bimanual coordination) and standing balance on a force platform. Results Individuals with mTBI demonstrated lower scores in all measures of cognition with statistically significant difference (p = 0.03) in executive function. The clinical tests of bimanual coordination did not show any statistically significant differences between groups. Postural stability was significantly reduced (p = 0.039) in the mTBI group. Conclusion Our results show long-term performance deficits (cognition and postural stability) that persist in individuals with mTBI. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify cognitive deficits in individuals with mTBI by utilizing NIHTB-CB. Knowledge gained from this study might affect decisions of return-to-play or return-to-learn in individuals with a history of mTBI(s).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Kunker, K., Peters, D. M., & Mohapatra, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mohapatra, Sambit
- Venue
- Neurological Sciences
- Published
- 2020-02-24
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1899-1907
- ISSN
- 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
- 1590-3478
- OpenAlex
- W3008933315
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Vermont (OVPR Express)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- mild traumatic brain injury, concussion, postural stability, executive function, cognitive impairment, bimanual coordination, standing balance, NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, return to sport, return to learn
- MeSH terms
- Brain Concussion, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Postural Balance, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review