Cited by 10Migraine and Headache StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Effectiveness of mindfulness by smartphone, for patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse during the Covid-19 emergency

Open access
Grazzi, Licia, Rizzoli, Paul, Andrasik, Frank·2020·Neurological Sciences

Abstract

.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10072-020-04659-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study by Grazzi et al demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of an mHealth mindfulness program for chronic migraineurs, resulting in a 50% retrospective reduction in migraine days and medication intake.

    “A recent study by Grazzi et al [114] demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of an mHealth mindfulness program for chronic migraineurs (headaches for ≥15 d in a month), resulting in a 50% retrospective reduction in migraine days and medication intake.”

    From Development and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Chatbot Coach to Facilitate a Balanced Lifestyle in Individuals With Headaches (BalanceUP App): Randomized Controlled Trial (2024) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Abstract reports that 15 patients completing the smartphone mindfulness protocol had mean reductions of 50% in both monthly migraine days and medication intake. It describes these as preliminary findings from treatment combined with prior medication withdrawal, recorded in daily headache diaries—not as a retrospective reduction attributable to the mHealth program alone. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 10

Metadata

Authors
Grazzi, L., Rizzoli, P., & Andrasik, F.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Grazzi, Licia
Venue
Neurological Sciences
Published
2020-08-13
Volume
41
Issue
S2
Pages
461-462
ISSN
  • 1590-1874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-3478
OpenAlex
W3049548261
Cited by
10
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness, mobile application, chronic migraine, medication overuse headache, COVID-19 pandemic, digital health interventions, migraine treatment
MeSH terms
Smartphone, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Headache Disorders, Secondary, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review