Clinical predictors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in nosocomial and healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, matched case–control study
Abstract
The situations in which coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP) or severe healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is needed are poorly defined, particularly outside intensive care units (ICUs). Our aim was to characterize if the risk of MRSA NP/HCAP can be defined by clinical variables. We designed an observational, retrospective, multicenter, case-control study to analyze the association between defined clinical variables and risk of MRSA NP/HCAP in non-ICU patients using conditional multivariable logistic regression. Cases and controls (1:2) with microbiological diagnosis were included. Controls were matched for hospital, type of pneumonia (NP or HCAP), and date of isolation. A total of 140 cases (77 NP and 63 HCAP) and 280 controls were studied. The variables associated with the risk of MRSA pneumonia were: (i) respiratory infection/colonization caused by MRSA in the previous year [odds ratio (OR) 14.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.13-53.13, p < 0.001]; (ii) hospitalization in the previous 90 days (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.21-4.81, p = 0.012); and (iii) age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.001-1.05, p = 0.040). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the multivariable model was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.78). The multivariate model had a sensitivity of 74.5% (95% CI 65.3-83.6), a specificity of 63.3% (95% CI 56.0-70.6), a positive predictive value of 52.5% (95% CI 43.9-61.2), and a negative predictive value of 82.0% (95% CI 75.3-88.8) for the observed data. Clinical predictors of MRSA NP/HCAP can be used to define a low-risk population in whom coverage against MRSA may not be needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patient-related risk factors for MRSA include prior MRSA infection or colonisation, recent IV antibiotics, recurrent skin infections or chronic wounds, invasive devices, haemodialysis, recent hospital admissions, and severity of illness.
“Patient-related risk factors for MRSA include prior history of MRSA infection or colonisation, recent IV antibiotics, history of recurrent skin infections or chronic wounds, presence of invasive devices, haemodialysis, recent hospital admissions and severity of illness [136, 138–142].”
From Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Torre-Cisneros, J., Natera, C., Mesa, F., Trikic, M., & Rodríguez-Baño, J.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES)
- Pfizer (Spain) (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Mesa, F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2017-09-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-4373
- OpenAlex
- W2752935398
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer Spain (NRA5950067)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
- Keywords
- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, nosocomial pneumonia, healthcare-associated pneumonia, clinical risk factors, MRSA colonization, recent hospitalization, non-ICU patients, risk prediction model, intensive care unit admission, age as risk factor, antimicrobial stewardship
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Pneumonia, Staphylococcal, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Case-Control Studies, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review