Clinical patterns of somatic symptoms in patients suffering from post-acute long COVID: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Long COVID-19 may affect patients after hospital discharge. This study aims to describe the burden of the long-term persistence of clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients. We conducted a systematic review by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies that included information on the prevalence of somatic clinical symptoms lasting at least 4 weeks after the onset of a PCR- or serology-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. The prevalence of persisting clinical symptoms was assessed and risk factors were described when investigated. Psychological symptoms and cognitive disorders were not evaluated in this study. Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies involved in-patients only with a duration of follow-up of either less than 12 weeks, 12 weeks to 6 months, or more. In these studies, fatigue (16–64%), dyspnea (15–61%), cough (2–59%), arthralgia (8–55%), and thoracic pain (5–62%) were the most frequent persisting symptoms. In nineteen studies conducted in a majority of out-patients, the persistence of these symptoms was lower and 3% to 74% of patients reported prolonged smell and taste disorders. The main risk factors for persisting symptoms were being female, older, having comorbidities and severity at the acute phase of the disease. COVID-19 patients should have access to dedicated multidisciplinary healthcare allowing a holistic approach. Effective outpatient care for patients with long-COVID-19 requires coordination across multiple sub-specialties, which can be proposed in specialized post-COVID units.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even with post-COVID-19 condition, evidence suggests that risk factors are not only of a biological nature, but also of a psychosocial nature.
“Even with this condition, however, evidence suggests that risk factors are not only of a biological nature, but also of a psychosocial nature. 125,126”
From Persistent physical symptoms: definition, genesis, and management (2024) · cites this paper as [126]
The section on symptoms persisting for 12 weeks to 6 months identifies biological and clinical risk factors, including age, body mass index, respiratory disease, and acute illness severity. The Inclusion criteria section says psychological and psychiatric disorders were not assessed; the paper does not establish psychosocial risk factors for post-COVID condition. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 91
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]26. Blomberg B, Mohn K, Brokstad KA, Linchausen D, Hansen B-A, Jalloh SL et al (2021) Long COVID affects home-isolated young patients. Nat Med 27:1607-1613. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41591-021-01433-3
- Authors
- Nguyen, N. N., Hoang, V. T., Dao, T. L., Dudouet, P., Eldin, C., & Gautret, P.
- Affiliations
- Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
- Méditerranée Infection Foundation (FR)
- Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy (VN)
- Corresponding author
- Gautret, Philippe
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2022-02-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-545
- ISSN
- 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-4373
- PMC
- PMC8830952
- OpenAlex
- W4211109891
- Semantic Scholar
- 9bb628d5d56f3a234cfaa7db0a33dc5cd45c4c23
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 19
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- long COVID, somatic symptoms, fatigue, dyspnea, cough, joint pain, chest pain, symptom persistence, risk factors, comorbidities, disease severity, multidisciplinary care
- MeSH terms
- Medically Unexplained Symptoms, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, Fatigue, Female, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review