The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian model selection
Open accessAbstract
Our purpose in this paper is to provide a general approach to model selection via penalization for Gaussian regression and to develop our point of view about this subject. The advantage and importance of model selection come from the fact that it provides a suitable approach to many different types of problems, starting from model selection per se (among a family of parametric models, which one is more suitable for the data at hand), which includes for instance variable selection in regression models, to nonparametric estimation, for which it provides a very powerful tool that allows adaptation under quite general circumstances. Our approach to model selection also provides a natural connection between the parametric and nonparametric points of view and copes naturally with the fact that a model is not necessarily true. The method is based on the penalization of a least squares criterion which can be viewed as a generalization of Mallows' C_p . A large part of our efforts will be put on choosing properly the list of models and the penalty function for various estimation problems like classical variable selection or adaptive estimation for various types of l_p -bodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
The sizes of compact subsets of Hilbert space and continuity of Gaussian processes
Dudley, R. M. (1967) · Journal of Functional Analysis · doi:10.1016/0022-1236(67)90017-1 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection
Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/09-ss054 · Cited by 3,522
Concentration Inequalities and Model Selection
(2007) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48503-2 · Cited by 744
Self-citationAdapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate
Abramovich, F., Benjamini, Y., Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (2006) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053606000000074 · Cited by 455
Minimax Rates of Estimation for High-Dimensional Linear Regression Over $\ell_q$-Balls
Raskutti, G., Wainwright, M. J., & Yu, B. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2165799 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Birgé, L., & Massart, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the European Mathematical Society
- Published
- 2001-09-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-268
- ISSN
- 1435-9855 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-9863
- OpenAlex
- W1995771589
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian model selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s100970100031
- The paper
- Birgé, L., & Massart, P. (2001). Gaussian model selection. Journal of the European Mathematical Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100970100031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.