Cited by 147Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Comparative and competitive adsorption of cadmium, copper, nickel, and lead ions by Iranian natural zeolite

Merrikhpour, Hajar, Jalali, Mohsen·2013·Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10098-012-0522-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large part of heavy metals such as As, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, and Ni are adsorbed with natural zeolites by chemisorption via intraparticle diffusion and inner-pore.

    “This result indicates that a large part of heavy metals such as As (Bilici Baskan and Pala, 2011), Cd (Merrikhpour and Jalali, 2013), Cr (Dimas Rivera et al., 2021;Lv et al., 2014a;Taamneh and Al Dwairi, 2013), Pb (Fei et al., 2010;Ratios, 2019), Hg (Shirzadi andNezamzadeh-Ejhieh, 2017), andNi (Al-Abbad andAl Dwairi, 2021;Rajic et al., 2010) are adsorbed with natural zeolites by chemisorption via”

    From Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review (2023) · cites this paper as Merrikhpour and Jalali, 2013

  • The pseudo-second order kinetic model has been the best fit for the adsorption of heavy metals with natural zeolites.

    “Among these kinetic models, the pseudo-second order kinetic model has been the best fit for the adsorption of heavy metals with natural zeolites.”

    From Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review (2023) · cites this paper as Merrikhpour and Jalali, 2013

  • The Freundlich model has been widely applied to adsorption data for heavy metal adsorption with zeolites.

    “The Freundlich model has also been widely applied to the adsorption data for heavy metal adsorption with zeolites (Kragović et al., 2013;Merrikhpour and Jalali, 2013;Salgado-Gómez et al., 2014;Song et al., 2015).”

    From Adsorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites: A review (2023) · cites this paper as Merrikhpour and Jalali, 2013

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 147

Authors
Merrikhpour, H., & Jalali, M.
Affiliations
Bu-Ali Sina University (IR)
Corresponding author
Merrikhpour, Hajar
Venue
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Published
2012-09-23
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
303-316
ISSN
  • 1618-954X (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-9558
OpenAlex
W2086102355
Cited by
147
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
competitive adsorption, heavy metal removal, natural zeolite, cadmium, copper, nickel, lead, industrial wastewater treatment, Freundlich isotherm, first-order kinetics, multicomponent solutions, ion exchange, metal precipitation, metal speciation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review