Comparison of the photodynamic fungicidal efficacy of methylene blue, toluidine blue, malachite green and low-power laser irradiation alone against Candida albicans
Open accessAbstract
This study was to evaluate specific effects of photodynamic therapy (energy density 15.8 J/cm(2), 26.3 J/cm(2) and 39.5 J/cm(2)) using methylene blue, toluidine blue and malachite green as photosensitizers and low-power laser irradiation on the viability of Candida albicans. Suspensions of C. albicans containing 10(6) cells/ml were standardized in a spectrophotometer. For each dye, 120 assays, divided into four groups according to the following experimental conditions, were carried out: laser irradiation in the presence of the photosensitizer; laser irradiation only; treatment with the photosensitizer only; no exposure to laser light or photosensitizer. Next, serial dilutions were prepared and seeded onto Sabouraud dextrose agar for the determination of the number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml). The results were subjected to analysis of variance and the Tukey test (P < 0.05). Photodynamic therapy using the photosensitizers tested was effective in reducing the number of C. albicans.. The number of CFU/ml was reduced by between 0.54 log(10) and 3.07 log(10) and depended on the laser energy density used. Toluidine blue, methylene blue and malachite green were effective photosensitizers in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against C. albicans, as was low-power laser irradiation alone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of phenothiazine dyes such as methylene blue, new methylene blue, and toluidine blue in PDT for the reduction of fungi.
“Many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of phenothiazine dyes such as methylene blue, new methylene blue, and toluidine blue in PDT for the reduction of fungi [256,258,259,261].”
From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [259]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Souza, R. C., Junqueira, J. C., Rossoni, R. D., Pereira, C. A., Munin, E., & Jorge, A. O. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
- Universidade Brasil (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Junqueira, Juliana Campos
- Venue
- Lasers in Medical Science
- Published
- 2009-07-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-389
- ISSN
- 0268-8921 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-604X
- OpenAlex
- W2066696602
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lasers in Medical Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
- UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
- Keywords
- photodynamic therapy, Candida albicans, methylene blue, toluidine blue, malachite green, photosensitizers, low-intensity laser radiation, laser fluence, antifungal activity, fungal viability
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Humans, Methylene Blue, Photochemotherapy, Rosaniline Dyes, Tolonium Chloride, Photosensitizing Agents, Low-Level Light Therapy, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review