The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm
Open accessAbstract
We obtain an improved finite-sample guarantee on the linear convergence of stochastic gradient descent for smooth and strongly convex objectives, improving from a quadratic dependence on the conditioning (L/μ)2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$(L/\mu )^2$$\end{document} (where L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L$$\end{document} is a bound on the smoothness and μ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\mu $$\end{document} on the strong convexity) to a linear dependence on L/μ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L/\mu $$\end{document}. Furthermore, we show how reweighting the sampling distribution (i.e. importance sampling) is necessary in order to further improve convergence, and obtain a linear dependence in the average smoothness, dominating previous results. We also discuss importance sampling for SGD more broadly and show how it can improve convergence also in other scenarios. Our results are based on a connection we make between SGD and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm, which allows us to transfer ideas between the separate bodies of literature studying each of the two methods. In particular, we recast the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm as an instance of SGD, and apply our results to prove its exponential convergence, but to the solution of a weighted least squares problem rather than the original least squares problem. We then present a modified Kaczmarz algorithm with partially biased sampling which does converge to the original least squares solution with the same exponential convergence rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Large-Scale Machine Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent
Bottou, L. (2010) · Proceedings of COMPSTAT'2010 · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-2604-3_16 · Cited by 5,795
Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 1. Description of system
Hounsfield, G. N. (1973) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016 · Cited by 3,924
Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course
Nesterov, Y. E. (2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,557
Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization
Nesterov, Y. (2004) · Applied Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8853-9 · Cited by 2,698
The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography
Natterer, F., & Wang, G. (2002) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.1429631 · Cited by 2,524
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27 (NIPS 2014)
Zhong, M., Goddard, N., & Sutton, C. A. (2014) · Cited by 2,440
Robust Stochastic Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming
Nemirovski, A., Juditsky, A., Lan, G., & Shapiro, A. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/070704277 · Cited by 1,945
Efficiency of Coordinate Descent Methods on Huge-Scale Optimization Problems
Nesterov, Y. (2012) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/100802001 · Cited by 1,187
The Tradeoffs of Large-Scale Learning
Bottou, L., & Bousquet, O. (2011) · Optimization for Machine Learning · doi:10.7551/mitpress/8996.003.0015 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence
Konečný, J., McMahan, H. B., Ramage, D., & Richtárik, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02527 · Cited by 1,563
Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving
Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.03295 · Cited by 509
Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoning
Fung, C., Yoon, C. J. M., & Beschastnikh, I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.04866 · Cited by 385
Does learning require memorization? a short tale about a long tail
Feldman, V. (2020) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing · doi:10.1145/3357713.3384290 · Cited by 287
Tackling System and Statistical Heterogeneity for Federated Learning with Adaptive Client Sampling
Luo, B., Xiao, W., Wang, S., Huang, J., & Tassiulas, L. (2022) · IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications · doi:10.1109/infocom48880.2022.9796935 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Needell, D., Srebro, N., & Ward, R.
- Venue
- Mathematical Programming
- Published
- 2015-02-03
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 549-573
- ISSN
- 0025-5610 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-4646
- OpenAlex
- W2162287622
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 38.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10107-015-0864-7
- The paper
- Needell, D., Srebro, N., & Ward, R. (2016). Stochastic gradient descent, weighted sampling, and the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm. Mathematical Programming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-015-0864-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.