The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges
Guagliardo, M. F. (2004) · International Journal of Health Geographics · doi:10.1186/1476-072x-3-3 · Cited by 1,533
Understanding and representing ‘place’ in health research: A relational approach
Cummins, S., Curtis, S., Diez-Roux, A. V., & Macintyre, S. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036 · Cited by 1,359
Tourism destination competitiveness: From definition to explanation?
Mazanec, J. A., Wöber, K., & Zins, A. H. (2007) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287507302389 · Cited by 437
Transport mobility benefits and quality of life: A time-use perspective of elderly Canadians
Spinney, J. E. L., Scott, D. M., & Newbold, K. B. (2009) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.01.002 · Cited by 340
The spatial syntax of urban segregation
Vaughan, L. (2007) · Progress in Planning · doi:10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwan, M.-P., Murray, A. T., O'Kelly, M. E., & Tiefelsdorf, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Geographical Systems
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-138
- ISSN
- 1435-5930 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5949
- OpenAlex
- W2005440857
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s101090300107
- The paper
- Kwan, M.-P., Murray, A. T., O'Kelly, M. E., & Tiefelsdorf, M. (2003). Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101090300107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
