Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 111Recommender Systems and TechniquesHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisData Management and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Travel route recommendation using geotagged photos

Kurashima, Takeshi, Iwata, Tomoharu, Irie, Go, Fujimura, Ko·2013·Knowledge and Information Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10115-012-0580-z

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Items 101–111 of 111

Metadata

Authors
Kurashima, T., Iwata, T., Irie, G., & Fujimura, K.
Affiliations
NTT (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Kurashima, Takeshi
Venue
Knowledge and Information Systems
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
37-60
ISSN
  • 0219-1377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0219-3116
OpenAlex
W2048272530
Cited by
108
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Knowledge and Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
route recommendation, geotagged photos, location history, topic modeling, Markov model, Flickr

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.