Impact of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project
Open accessAbstract
A recent health economic survey in Europe has suggested that migraine is the costliest among the neurological disorders. According to many studies, migraine and other disorders lead to widespread suffering, reduction of quality of life, and marked impairment of participation, both in work and social activities. The present literature survey was made in order to summarize what is known on the subject, as a preparation for a EU-supported study to assess the impact in several EU countries with similar methodology and the same research instrument. Previous studies have yielded relatively reliable data only for migraine, whereas the impact of tension-type headache is virtually unknown or only very incompletely known for most dimensions of headache impact. Some data do suggest, however, that this headache may be as important from a health economic and a public health perspective as migraine. In future studies it is important to get population-based data from various countries relevant for estimation of indirect (mostly absenteeism from work and reduced working efficiency when having headache) and direct costs (related to medication, consultations, investigations and hospitalisations). Also, the impact on ability to get education and participate in the workforce is very relevant, as is the impact on love life and family planning. The quality of life of headache patients should be measured by validated instruments. To get a complete picture, one should also ask about the effect on the life of partners and children, and on the possible impact even when headache-free (e.g. fear of the next attack).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With regard to impact of headache disorders, evidence is quite limited for migraine and non-existent for TTH and MOH.
“With regard to impact of headache disorders, evidence is quite limited for migraine [16] and non-existent for TTH and MOH.”
From The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 154
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [23]Auray JP Impact socio-economique de la migraine et des cephalees en France CNS Drugs 2006 20 Spec no.1 37 46 16841525
- [26]Lainez MJA, Monzon MJ (2003) The socioeconomic impact of migraine in Spain. In: Reducing the burden of headache. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255–259
- [31]Rasmussen BK Jensen R Olesen J Impact of headache on sickness absence and utilisation of medical services: a Danish population study J Epidemiol Commun Health 1992 46 443 446 PMC1059617 1431724
- [32]Boardman HF Thomas E Croft PR Millson DS Epidemiology of headache in an English district Cephalalgia 2003 23 129 137 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00468.x 12603370 · DOI
- [55]Lipton RB Hamelsky SW Kolodner KB Steiner TJ Stewart WF Migraine, quality of life, and depression: a population-based case-control study Neurology 2000 55 629 635 10980724
- Authors
- Stovner, L. J., Andrée, C., & On behalf of the Eurolight Steering Committee
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Stovner, Lars Jacob
- Venue
- The Journal of Headache and Pain
- Published
- 2008-04-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 139-146
- ISSN
- 1129-2369 (ISSN-L)
- 1129-2377
- PMC
- PMC2386850
- OpenAlex
- W2015650886
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Headache and Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- headache, migraine, tension-type headache, health economic burden, quality of life, absenteeism, productivity loss, health care costs, education and employment, family planning, fear of recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Costs and Cost Analysis, Europe, Family Health, Headache, Humans, Migraine Disorders, Quality of Life, Health Care Costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review