Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23Access Control and TrustLogic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeInformation and Cyber Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing XACML policies using answer set programming

Rezvani, Mohsen, Rajaratnam, David, Ignjatovic, Aleksandar, Pagnucco, Maurice, Jha, Sanjay·2019·International Journal of Information Security

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10207-018-0421-5

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T.: Clingo = ASP + control: Preliminary report. CoRR arXiv:1405.3694 (2014) · arXiv
  2. Mejri, M., Yahyaoui, H.: Formal specification and integration of distributed security policies. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 49, 1–35 (2017)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rezvani, M., Rajaratnam, D., Ignjatovic, A., Pagnucco, M., & Jha, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Shahrood (IR)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Rezvani, Mohsen
Venue
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
465-479
ISSN
  • 1615-5262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-5270
OpenAlex
W2902278604
Cited by
23
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
International Journal of Information Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
XACML, access control policies, answer set programming, policy analysis, policy verification, policy translation, policy conflict, reachability, clingo, policy analysis tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.