Random resampling algorithms for addressing the imbalanced dataset classes in insider threat detection
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[36] achieved a ROC-AUC for KNN with Over-Sampling of 87%.
“The model achieved the following ROC-AUC results: DT with Under-Sampling as 94%; KNN with Over-Sampling as 87%; KNN + Hybrid-Sampling as 87%.”
From Enhancing Insider Threat Detection in Imbalanced Cybersecurity Settings Using the Density-Based Local Outlier Factor Algorithm (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
[36] achieved a ROC-AUC for KNN + Hybrid-Sampling of 87%.
“The model achieved the following ROC-AUC results: DT with Under-Sampling as 94%; KNN with Over-Sampling as 87%; KNN + Hybrid-Sampling as 87%.”
From Enhancing Insider Threat Detection in Imbalanced Cybersecurity Settings Using the Density-Based Local Outlier Factor Algorithm (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
[36] achieved a ROC-AUC for DT with Under-Sampling of 94%.
“The model achieved the following ROC-AUC results: DT with Under-Sampling as 94%; KNN with Over-Sampling as 87%; KNN + Hybrid-Sampling as 87%.”
From Enhancing Insider Threat Detection in Imbalanced Cybersecurity Settings Using the Density-Based Local Outlier Factor Algorithm (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 25
- Authors
- Al-Shehari, T., & Alsowail, R. A.
- Affiliations
- King Saud University (SA)
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Security
- Published
- 2022-12-26
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 611-629
- ISSN
- 1615-5262 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5270
- OpenAlex
- W4312222414
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Information Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- insider threat detection, class imbalance, random resampling, data leakage detection, CERT insider threat dataset, cybersecurity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
