Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is an extensive body of research on the topic of technology adoption.
“User acceptance of technology is often an important factor in the success or failure of information systems in any domain and there is an extensive body of research on the topic of technology adoption [37].”
User acceptance of technology is often an important factor in the success or failure of information systems in any domain.
“User acceptance of technology is often an important factor in the success or failure of information systems in any domain and there is an extensive body of research on the topic of technology adoption [37].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 391 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
- ORCID
- Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
- Venue
- Universal Access in the Information Society
- Published
- 2017-03-30
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-390
- ISSN
- 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5297
- OpenAlex
- W2600147483
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 391
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- information technology adoption, technology acceptance, technology adoption model, research trends, research gaps, adoption factors, information systems research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
