Accessibility of public library websites in the United States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-compliance with accessibility standards can lead to legal repercussions, reduced market share, and a tarnished reputation.
“Non-compliance with accessibility standards can lead to legal repercussions, reduced market share, and a tarnished reputation [4], [5].”
From Digital Accessibility in Higher Education: A Dutch case study (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Campbell-Meier, J., & Velasquez, D. (2025) · Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association · doi:10.1080/24750158.2025.2522472 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Digital Accessibility in Higher Education: A Dutch case study
Smit, K., van de Hoef, A., Kuiper, N., Todorova, J., Hartman, F., Leewis, S., & Gevaert, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Software and e-Business · doi:10.1145/3715885.3715890 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Non-compliance with accessibility standards can lead to legal repercussions, reduced market share, and a tarnished reputation [4], [5].”
Krittika, K., & Shimray, S. R. (2025) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-025-01218-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Khawaja, P.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Khawaja, Paul
- ORCID
- Khawaja, Paul
- Venue
- Universal Access in the Information Society
- Published
- 2022-01-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1047-1057
- ISSN
- 1615-5289 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-5297
- OpenAlex
- W4283385656
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 12.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Universal Access in the Information Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
- Keywords
- public library websites, web accessibility, people with disabilities, Section 508, accessibility errors, community demographics, library users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
