The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models
Open accessAbstract
The lack of practicable nonlinear elastic contact models frequently compels the inappropriate use of Hertzian models in analyzing indentation data and likely contributes to inconsistencies associated with the results of biological atomic force microscopy measurements. We derived and validated with the aid of the finite element method force-indentation relations based on a number of hyperelastic strain energy functions. The models were applied to existing data from indentation, using microspheres as indenters, of synthetic rubber-like gels, native mouse cartilage tissue, and engineered cartilage. For the biological tissues, the Fung and single-term Ogden models achieved the best fits of the data while all tested hyperelastic models produced good fits for the synthetic gels. The Hertz model proved to be acceptable for the synthetic gels at small deformations (strain < 0.05 for the samples tested), but not for the biological tissues. Although this finding supports the generally accepted view that many soft materials can be assumed to be linear elastic at small deformations, the nonlinear models facilitate analysis of intrinsically nonlinear tissues and large-strain indentation behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, K. L. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139171731 · Cited by 7,796
Molecular Mechanisms of Stress-Responsive Changes in Collagen and Elastin Networks in Skin
Aziz, J., Shezali, H., Radzi, Z., Yahya, N. A., Abu Kassim, N. H., Czernuszka, J., & Rahman, M. T. (2016) · Skin Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1159/000447017 · Cited by 7,323
The Physics of Rubber Elasticity
Treloar, L. R. G., & Montgomery, D. J. (1959) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3060678 · Cited by 3,787
A Theory of Large Elastic Deformation
Mooney, M. (1940) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1712836 · Cited by 3,580
Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook
(2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-69002-5 · Cited by 3,429
A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials
Arruda, E. M., & Boyce, M. C. (1993) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 · Cited by 3,239
Tabor, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198507765.001.0001 · Cited by 3,118
Ogden, R. W. (1972) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1972.0026 · Cited by 2,979
The physics of rubber elasticity
Zimm, B. H., & Kilb, R. W. (1959) · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-3697(59)90114-3 · Cited by 2,950
Introduction to Physical Polymer Science
Sperling, L. H. (2005) · doi:10.1002/0471757128 · Cited by 2,917
Cited by
The soft mechanical signature of glial scars in the central nervous system
Moeendarbary, E., Weber, I. P., Sheridan, G. K., Koser, D. E., Soleman, S., Haenzi, B., Bradbury, E. J., Fawcett, J., & Franze, K. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14787 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, D. C., Shreiber, D. I., Dimitriadis, E. K., & Horkay, F.
- Venue
- Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
- Published
- 2008-11-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 345-358
- ISSN
- 1617-7940 (ISSN-L)
- 1617-7959
- OpenAlex
- W2105873482
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9
- The paper
- Lin, D. C., Shreiber, D. I., Dimitriadis, E. K., & Horkay, F. (2009). Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.